User talk:AGreatPhoenixSunsFan

Bro I dont know how to start a conversation on here but I guess youll delete this when your finish reading it. I respect all your information and your absolutely correct on all but one. Josh played at Prolific Prep, He took classes at Siena to maintain grade average. But In Napa He wont remember Classes at Siena as much as games and practices spent at Prolific with his brother. Im a Close friend of Paul Scruggs who goes there now. Im not trying to go against your information. But pro prep means alot to me. Dont leave us out please. Thanks

Welcome!

Hello, AGreatPhoenixSunsFan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mysdaao ^talk 12:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hakim Warrick

No one knows his #, because he was never officially introduced. They will update the site when the season starts. Maybe earlier. Most people assume it will be #21, but no one knows. RevanFan (talk) 02:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix Suns Alternate Logo Error Fix

You were right. There was an error in the logo and i fix it. A clipping mask was missing in the SVG file and i didn't double check the file after the upload. I think the logo is in good shape now. Come back on that if you see an other mistake. Thanks to you and sorry for the delay, i don't upload anymore on wikipedia cause it's a lot of work and most of the people here didn't respect that. So i keep all my works for me now. Kalel2007 (talk) 23:24, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Gentlest That I've Heard The Chairman of The Diplomat Behind A Half

The article The Gentlest That I've Heard The Chairman of The Diplomat Behind A Half has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Jeremy Lin, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 10:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder again to please not mark edits as minor when adding disputable content such as this recent edit to Jeremy Lin. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 07:05, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Basketball Association stats

Hey, you seem to know a little bit about the CBA. Is there a good site where I can find players' stats? Thanks. Zagalejo^^^ 21:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Patience

Nothing has been finalized with regards to Lin. It will be a while before anything is. Just be patient; the article will be properly updated when it becomes necessary. Zagalejo^^^ 06:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kind request to please wait until after the July moratorium ends on July 11 before any NBA free agent related changes since as your recent edit to Deron Williams. Otherwise, please form a new consensus at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Basketball_Association#Free_agent_signings. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although the moratorium is over, the general rule is not to update the article making it sound like the deal is complete until a source says the transaction is official. Words liked "reports" or "anonymous sources" are indicators that a transaction is not official.—Bagumba (talk) 22:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Brooklyn Nets players

Will you please stop adding Category:Brooklyn Nets players to articles? The consensus at WP:NBA is to add a player category only if the player has appeared in at least 1 regular or postseason season game for that team. The Brooklyn Nets players is an entirely different category than New Jersey Nets players, and until the end of October 2012, not a single player belongs in in it. Unless the Brooklyn Nets have begun some Super Secret League that only you know about, that franchise has yet to play a single game. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spain template

I think I figured out what the problem was; the "6th place" in the title line was messing things up. You should be able to edit it now, although I think there is some value in leaving the M. in front of Gasol, so that people quickly glancing at it know which Gasol it is. Zagalejo^^^ 01:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotecting pages

Saw your note in your edit summary to Josh Childress and unprotected the page. In the future, WP:RPP is the reliable place to make protection-related requests that don't rely on an admin just happening to be reading your edit summary. Nice catch.—Bagumba (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Twiztid Abominationz.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Twiztid Abominationz.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California Golden Bears men's basketball retired number navbox

Template:California Golden Bears men's basketball retired number navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lamar Odom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give New Orleans Pelicans a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 06:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013–14 Phoenix Suns season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Archie Goodwin

Alex Len (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ukrainian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL

If you add Zoran Dragić to Phoenix Suns all-time roster again prior to him playing in a regular season game, you will be blocked. Jrcla2 (talk) 18:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dragić

Please don't edit based on breaking news of transactions based on unofficial announcements. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 00:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phoenix Suns all-time roster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The picks aren't official until the commissioner reads the name.

Please wait to update. Rikster2 (talk) 00:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 NBA Summer League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kyle Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gerald Green, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DaHuzyBru (talk) 14:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NBA Summer League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kyle Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Asian Month Barnstar
	Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! --AddisWang (talk) 14:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bakersfield Jam

Please do not add that the Bakersfield Jam have attained a new franchise or rumors of possible affiliations. The Clippers "fact" comes from an editorialization from a local paper and the only facts we know are what has been announced here, which states that the D-League and Ellis/Higdon are in negotiations but there is nothing conclusive about a future team yet to announce. Yosemiter (talk) 03:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the full extant of the summary (with editorial comments) that essentially states it could be any NBA team that doesn't currently own a D-League team. Yosemiter (talk) 03:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few NBA franchises currently without a team in the D-League. The Sacramento Kings and Los Angeles Clippers could be the front-runners to get a team in Bakersfield, but Ellis also said that there are at least two NBA teams a few hours to the east that are an option.
Other than that, he wouldn't give up any clues.
"I'll let you draw your own conclusions," he laughed. "That's as much as I'm allowed to give at this point."

[1]

May 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kurt Rambis. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been warned multiple times in the past about inclusion of unsourced, speculative, breaking news. —Bagumba (talk) 18:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhoenixSunsOldLogo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PhoenixSunsOldLogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 22:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Phoenix Suns season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wells Fargo Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Derrick Jones, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016

Wikipedia Asian Month

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Sign up now

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!

Hi there! Thanks for joining Wikipedia Asian Month. Here is some information about participating in the event:

Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for language editions.
If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes,--AddisWang (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

hey have a good day

Cassiey (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, nice one. :) – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 03:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AGreatPhoenixSunsFan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Jackson draft declaration

I get why you added it but every reliable source I have found has said he has not made a decision plus their official Twitter account as well as his account has no decision on it and I'm guessing that's where it will get posted first.--Rockchalk717 06:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At least I'm glad to hear you understand why I felt questioned by it. To be honest, I felt like not including the source myself the first time I saw it (almost thought it was a typo, believe it or not). However, there was something in my mind telling me if they got the first scoop on his confirmation, it must have meant something went down (if only in private), and those guys were the first to at least somewhat confirm it. Still, no problems here. :) – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 07:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It might have been an anonymous source kind of thing. Sometimes those sources are wrong. Since the article was written recently it might not be public information. I won't be surprised if we get something official in the next few days. Speaking as a diehard Kansas Basketball fan (in case you can't tell by my user name lol) I hope he comes back, as unlikely as that is.--Rockchalk717 16:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I didn't even recognize your name! :P (Although that's partially because of your design choice there.) Anyways, I definitely hear you there. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 08:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Draft list

Thanks for taking the combine sort off, but in the process you added back a bunch of folks who had been removed because they were returning to school. I took out the ones I knew off the top of my head, but it would be helpful if you could go in and scrub the list yourself to see if there is anyone else. Rikster2 (talk) 13:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arron Afflalo

I know you know the deal with these. Deal needs to be announced by the Magic/NBA. It's why there is a note at the top of the article and it's why the article is protected. Rikster2 (talk) 01:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True. I thought the piece including his name had an official link in the original post I saw it under for the List of 2017-18 NBA Transactions, and in fairness, I was going to get back to that link later on. Guess either I misunderstood the link included in that aforementioned post in mind or the link wasn't an official NBA link that was included there. Either way, that's fair enough all the same. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 01:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Magette too. Rikster2 (talk) 23:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dragan Bender

The Suns only list him as a forward. See here. Rikster2 (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Metta World Peace

GMGB shoould not be in the infobox per precedent of BIG3 (Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Basketball/Archive_11#BIG3). I'd even argue that it not even major enough to be in the lead. The league hasnt gotten much independent coverage yet.—Bagumba (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

November 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Zaza Pachulia, you may be blocked from editing. DaHuzyBru (talk) 05:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, another reminder about unsourced updates to articles about transactions based on unnamed sources in breaking news, like your Mike James' edit. Generally, WP:SPORTSTRANS is followed, waiting for an official announcement and citing the source. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 06:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AGreatPhoenixSunsFan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NBA high school draftees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forest Hills High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What’s your source on Amile Jefferson’s deal being official?

It’s not on the TWolves site nor their Twitter. Rikster2 (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is! – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jamil Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to STD

LaVar Ball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tweet

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Derrick Rose. Final warning to please cite a source that deals are officially completed, and do not make unsourced edits based on breaking news. —Bagumba (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2017–18 Phoenix Suns season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elfrid Payton

List of 2017–18 NBA season transactions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elfrid Payton

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mixing unsourced text with existing citations

Hi. If you are going to add unsourced text to a page, please don't put it before existing citations per WP:INTEGRITY. It makes it look like the new text is supported by the old citations, such as your addition to List of National Basketball Association undrafted players about undrafted players in the HOF.[2][3] That aside, thanks for filling out the list for all the draft years! Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I didn't realize that beforehand. Good to know for future reference! That being said, I thank you for the respect you've given me on the help I did for that article, primarily since no one else was likely going to be doing it otherwise. Honestly, I think that's all I've been asking for here since the past few years. So I thank you for giving that to me there. :) – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 NBA draft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elfrid Payton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Omer Yurtseven

He has not yet declared for the draft. He asked for his release from NC State and has said he will either transfer or explore his pro options but other than that has stated nothing about the NBA draft. Please stop adding him to the underclassman list at 2018 NBA draft. Rikster2 (talk) 20:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Random thoughts

Keep up the Ball updates! A couple of quick points on your Lonzo edit: we generally just use the subject's last name and not their first to refer to them (MOS:SURNAME), and Wikipedia just uses regular past tense for verbs and generally stays away from using would (whatever they call that tense). Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 10:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Well, I just use a specific website for information like that, so... – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 NBA draft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elfrid Payton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Cook on 2018 NBA draft

Shouldn’t be redlinked. Those are to encourage article creation. Cook isn’t notable (see here). Per Wikipedia:Red link, “Red links should not be made to deleted articles unless the reason for the deletion of the article was not due to a lack of notability or the topic not being encyclopedic in another way.” Rikster2 (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but consider the fact that many other players in similar situations have the same thing also. What do you do there? - AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

who else has gone through an AfD with a result of “delete?” That’s the issue. Rikster2 (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but even then, it's still someone that currently is out of place with the rest of the group in question. Granted, if Tyler Cook decided to exit the draft, this conversation will be completely irrelevant for the point of the draft (at least until either 2019 or 2020, but that's just semantics at this point in time), but until then, I just don't see the situation at hand. If he's drafted this year or plays in the NBA, he's going to get an article anyways. This just feels like a situation where an anthill's being made like a mountain on this regard. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 21:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But nothing has changed since this recent AfD decision. In a year or two one could reasonably make the case he may be notable at that point, but right now we know he isn’t. Also, if you think this is a mountain out of a mole hill, then why are you so worried about red linking it? To make it look like other names on the list? That’s dumb. There are other names on that list who are notable based on their college careers, that’s why a red link exists - to encourage creating the article. Rikster2 (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Look, let's be realistic with most of these names that are in the college section for just one minute. You know for a fact that most of these names would likely never play any professional basketball minutes ever again after college. Granted, some of them can make their cases in due time, but you can't seriously tell me with a straight face that someone like Dextor Foster from ASA College (a place I never even heard of before he tried to enter this year's draft that's also a for-profit university) would realistically still be playing basketball for the long-term. I mean, come on now. By the end of May, we'll have a better idea of what's going on there, and we can move on with our lives properly there. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 21:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, realistically you actually never know. D2’s Ferris State’s Zach Hankins is on the list and I’ve looked for sources - he meets GNG. But we just give the benefit of the doubt that the players who declare early could meet GNG until it’s proven they don’t. There are tons of editors who create articles for red links, which is what red links are for at the end of the day. If you Red link an article where it has has already been proven the subject doesn’t meet GNG, you are just setting up an editor to waste their time writing an article that is just going to be immediately deleted. Yeah, we could go through each red linked pkayer and do a source search to see if they meet GNG and de-link those that don’t, but that isn’t all that worthwhile given the temporary nature of many of the names on the list. Rikster2 (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

True. I mean, we both agree that this current list is only temporary anyways. Might as well just agree to disagree and move on from there, especially by the end of May. :P – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 22:59, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See? What did I tell you? – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 00:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LiAngelo Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Welsh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing style and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch

Hello and thank you for your in-depth efforts in editing pages such as 2018–19 Phoenix Suns season. However, please be advised that you have tendency to use excessively un-encyclopedic words. Please review the Wikipedia Manual of Style, especially in regards to WP:PEACOCK, WP:WEASEL, WP:EDITORIAL, and WP:IDIOMS. All articles in Wikipedia should be precise and concise, without the flowery phrases common in journalism. Remember, this is just a site for verifiable information, not a personal blog for your thoughts on your favorite sports team. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yosemiter: There was a quite similar discussion about the user's editing style here. We understand that you are editing in good faith and might get carried away now and then, but when the "carried away" part applies to most of your edits then it becomes disruptive and we might start thinking if you are really in the right place. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second what Toiletpaper101 said, please stop with the overuse of "would" in your edits. I repeat, please keep the content you add precise and concise. For example, in this edit, you wrote:

Entering the night of the draft, the Mavericks would originally have only the fifth and thirty-third picks of the 2018 NBA Draft. The Mavericks would fall down a spot from their original position at fourth that night due to them originally missing out on the Top 3 selections, despite having the tiebreaker over the Atlanta Hawks for better odds there. This also resulted in them having the better second round pick over the Hawks by comparison. Ironically, by the night of the draft, Dallas would trade their original first round pick in the draft (which became Oklahoma University point guard Trae Young) and a protected 2019 first round pick to Atlanta in exchange for the Hawks' own first round pick, which turned out to be the Slovenian superstar guard/forward Luka Dončić.

It is far more encyclopedic to write:

Entering the night of the draft, the Mavericks originally had only the fifth and thirty-third picks of the 2018 NBA Draft. The Mavericks' original position was at the fourth pick but fell to fifth after Atlanta Hawks, originally in the sixth position, were selected in the lottery. On the night of the draft, Dallas then traded their original first round pick, Oklahoma University point guard Trae Young, and a protected 2019 first round pick to Atlanta in exchange for the Hawks' first round pick, Slovenian guard/forward Luka Dončić.

I suppose I should also mention that is not what irony means, that is coincidence, as it is not the opposite of what is expected to happen. It was simply a luck of the draw and a business decision. Yosemiter (talk) 19:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again with the overuse of "would be" when simply stating "became" is just as true and more precise. Yosemiter (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And again Yosemiter (talk) 23:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And again Yosemiter (talk) 23:04, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overuse of "would"

I noticed that a lot of articles that you write are filled with the word "would" when describing something that took place in the past. For future use, the frequent use of this conditional tense should be avoided in most cases. For example, this sentence that you wrote:

On April 7, 2018, Booker would be one of about 50 or 100 people to officially travel to Garfield High School to tryout for the Seattle Ballers...

This can be correctly written as:

On April 7, 2018, Booker was one of about 50 or 100 people to officially travel to Garfield High School to tryout for the Seattle Ballers...

Toiletpaper101 (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, thanks! :) – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 20:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On a separate note, can you upload logos for all the JBA teams, like you did with the Chicago Ballers? (even those without pages yet) Toiletpaper101 (talk) 23:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Just give me some time to get back home first and I'll link you to them ASAP! :) - AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 23:34, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I got two of teams down now! Just tell me where you want me to put the rest under next. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 05:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I got them all down now! You can start with the Houston Ballers article (since that just got a player with a Wikipedia article recently) and then afterward, go from there on in with the rest of the team pages we discussed. Each of them have the same image file name as the one you had with the Chicago Ballers wordmark.png you first had. :) – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 16:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you by any chance update the rosters for all JBA team articles, because the official league website has been redesigned to include every team's players and coaches? Atlanta already done. Toiletpaper101 (talk) 16:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft picks

Come on dude, the pick have to actually happen. The tweet even says “sources” Rikster2 (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mikal Bridges

You are getting a real steal in Mikal Bridges. It was a stupid decision to trade him, especially on an unproven talent like Zhaire Smith, who to my eyes is a good dunker and not much else. C'est la vie. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 02:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks for the comment there! :D Seriously, I'm as amazed as you are, really. :P – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Kostas is going to amount to anything in the NBA? I think he will play a few games, not do much, and go to Europe. He does have good genes though lol. Would have rather they take Malik Newman, who I'm surprised went undrafted. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 04:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Honestly, part of it was meant a bit more in jest after your first comment here. However, there's something about Kostas that makes me think he'd do something for Philadelphia in the future. At least, more than George King would for Phoenix. :P – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 06:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Philadelphia 76ers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyler Ennis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Curtis Hollis

Hey I noticed you posted on Toiletpaper101's talkpage that you found something about the JBA prospect Curtis Hollis. It's alright if you don't want to start the article now, but could you provide the sources that you saw about him. That way I can evaluate the sources and perhaps write an article about him. Cheers ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 02:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Besides SB Nation article I told you about on Kezo Brown's page? Well, I can provide a few more in mind, even though I don't have any proper high school or college career stuff down yet. Sun Times article on the JBA; Hutchinson Community College profile page; Football Profile; Football Recruiting. That's about it for now. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 03:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, created it. See what you can add. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 03:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced, unofficial deals

re: your Thomas Welsh edit, I know you know the drill about providing references and avoiding anonymous sources. Thanks, and keep up the otherwise good work.—Bagumba (talk) 14:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, when talking about Summer League games make sure to cite your sources. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 20:53, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to JBA articles. Just a minor thing, please make sure to fill out the refs instead of just a bare url. Happy editing ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 22:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are still listing unofficial transactions, such as you inclusion of the waiving of Darrell Arthur in this edit. Please stick to official facts only and do NOT speculate or insert others' speculations (or their use of "inside sources tell us") as facts. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 04:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 NBA G League draft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erie BayHawks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

Please read Wikipedia:Bare URLs and avoid adding incomplete references like you did here. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 21:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template at the end of BLP page

Please do not add templates of the NBA team/teams to BLP pages as you did in Jason Kidd, Grant Hill, Steve Nash, Rick Welts and Charlie Scott pages without verifying that they are listed there first. In addition, we do not list people in team pages or anywhere else until they get inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame. There is also a WP:TCREEP policy, which clearly indicates that templates should be not added to pages for no good reason. – Sabbatino (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Phoenix Suns season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dream Team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "would"

I see that Toiletpaper101 and Yosemiter discussed with you earlier about your use of would with verbs. I just saw it in you recent edit (e.g. "would be named" and "would decline") at LiAngelo Ball. Is there any further help or advice you need on this? Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 11:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Similar tonal butchering includes "had" in this context. AGreatPhoenixSunsFan has been made aware of this many times in the past yet continues to persist with it. It's a very odd and bizarre word usage that always requires copyediting. DaHuzyBru (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this. Yosemiter (talk) 13:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:N'T policy should also be mentioned, because the user in question has also been made aware of its existence, but keeps using contractions. – Sabbatino (talk) 17:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, please stop adding WP:OR and/or speculative content. At least try to include a source when adding something, but be careful what you are adding. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:41, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cut it out with the WP:EDITORIALs

Please take a look at my cleanup of your editorial mess. There is just a ton of unnecessary words, WP:EDITORIAL words, and WP:SPECULATION on your part that is entirely un-encyclopedic. This is an encyclopedia, not a frickin' personal blog on your thoughts about the Suns. Also please practice more concise encyclopedic language. "In addition,... as well." is entirely pointless. (Also you continue to use "would", STOP IT). Yosemiter (talk) 15:46, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Read the edit summary here Yosemiter (talk) 22:37, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also this is why it is not a "disabled player'S exception". It is for the team, not the player. Yosemiter (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, stop your fanboy edits. Yosemiter (talk) 16:47, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I have started a discussion about your questionable contributions and general unresponsiveness on the NBAproject talk page. Yosemiter (talk) 18:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to 2018–19 Phoenix Suns season while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. You are responsible for your additions of unsourced, breaking news, even if you are logged out. Please stop. —Bagumba (talk) 23:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2018–19 Phoenix Suns season. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 01:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, this is for your addition of "being frustrated with the team's losing streak", which also borders on WP:NPOV, which you added while logged out.—Bagumba (talk) 01:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Markelle Fultz. DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit summary – check out and respond to criticism here at your talk page and stop violating Wikipedia's politeness policy. "What you and Bagumba do sometimes doesn't help me out at all." Have you taken on board any of the advice here at you talk page over the years or the countless reverts you have received? I don't see any evidence of such, hence the persistent content disputes from not just myself. The problems with your editing has resulted in a whole topic discussion at WT:NBA. Your editing style is atrocious and the only person who can change that is you. DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 14:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, this edit of your's while logged out is unsourced, and you can't even make the argument that information about a double-double at halftime is available in a simple boxscore.—Bagumba (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AGreatPhoenixSunsFan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AGreatPhoenixSunsFan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Eric Moreland. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 23:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 05:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Deandre Ayton while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 23:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Mikal Bridges while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 17:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 2018–19 Los Angeles Lakers season. For this edit under one of your known IPs. Yosemiter (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will also remind you to conform with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Your recent edits (this, this and this) just show that you did not learn anything from your blocks and continue to be trivial, unsourced, editorial, disruptive, etc. Additionally, stop editing by using multiple IPs, which can give other editors a reason to report you at WP:SPI (I am not even mentioning WP:AN3, WP:ANI or WP:LTA). – Sabbatino (talk) 11:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LaVar Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Yosemiter (talk) 15:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have indefinitely blocked you for extensive, pervasive and abusive editing while logged out. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24499 was submitted on Mar 28, 2019 16:59:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had previously made a detailed enough request in the Unblock Ticket Request System thinking I was banned from even my user talk page, when apparently I wasn't in my e-mail response in regards to it? Honestly, I'm not going to question that one. Instead, I want to appeal my case by apologizing to mainstay Wikipedia members where I might have acted like an ass towards, for lack of a better word or term, and wanting to showcase that I'm willing to listen to you guys on whatever is absolutely necessary for me to improve my stay around here for the future. I also want to showcase that in regards to the problem of "IP hopping" in mind as something that I have not intended to do on my part, to showcase that I would plan on showcasing myself around with my proper whenever I might be on a different computer or other operating system at hand for future reference, in the event that such a thing is absolutely necessary for me to do in the future. Finally, I want to prove to anyone in question that I am not related to the user known as A Great Catholic Person whatsoever. This might take a bit, so forgive me if I ramble on too much.
When it came to any prior animosity I had in mind during late 2018 and early 2019 in particular, I admit that it related to my anger at the idea that I felt like I was making edits that I genuinely thought were being helpful towards multiple articles, yet it felt like I was being attacked despite trying to do everything in my power that I possibly could have at the time to make sure my edits were passable to the goal of Wikipedia. After that point, it just felt like what was being done felt like it was near the point of malice at times; even though I now get that wasn't the intention of edits from users like DaHuzyBru and Bagumba in particular, that kind of mindset at the time was what lead me to feel like I shouldn't even bother responding towards some of these members altogether in relation to their response edits. That was wrong of me to do there, and I'm truly sorry for that. Anything you guys want to air out to me here, you're free to do so now. I still do like this place, and I still want to prove myself as helpful for it whenever necessary. That's why I want to say any advice that you can give to me there to help me change my ways, I'd be glad to take in mind to try and utilize in the near future in the event my block is lifted.

As for the problem with multiple IP addresses, that's something I never intended to do on purpose (save for that one time from that aforementioned period of time, but even then, I still planned to follow that IP ban naturally otherwise afterward). I do use incognito mode from my operating systems (yes, I have more than one) I use for reasons I wish to not go into at this point in time. Another thing of note is that sometimes, when I do look like I'm editing from another IP address for some reason, it sometimes relates to me having to reset my router to connect onto the Internet again after it decides to stop working on me for no particular reason, which is definitely something I hate when it does happen to me. In those rare occasions where it's not that (though it does look more and more common due to me going out a bit more lately), it is admittedly me coming from other locations (i.e., my mom's house or somewhere else on vacation like New York, Michigan, or even Canada at one point), with any more recent occasions coming from my local library, gym, or even community center. It definitely sucks when IP addresses are attached to you and they get changed without warning sometimes, especially in relation to Wikipedia's standards. That's why if I'm unblocked, I want to showcase who I am a bit more often, regardless on what operating system I'm on or where I'm at. I also hope this helps explain what goes on with me; I do not hold any virtual private networks or anything that could be considered malicious like that.

One more thing I want to touch up on is the recent slander of my name to another user that looks to hold a similar user name in terms of how they're showcased. While I admittedly don't know where A Great Catholic Person lives within this world, I have no connection with that guy whatsoever (besides, I don't think he's even a fan of the Phoenix Suns in the first place). For starters, I have never edited anything here as a different Wikipedia user, even with the temptation in mind. Next, while I don't know what A Great Catholic Person's interests were exactly, I would think it's safe to say he wouldn't be interested in editing for articles like XXXTentacion, Psychopathic Records, or even music in the black metal or death metal genres (or at least, remain neutral about it as opposed to reacting rather negatively about them (like I presume he would have)). Finally, and I would think this would be the breaking point in terms of comparisons with the guy in question, my religion is not Catholicism. While I do believe in a God and was raised with Christian beliefs, my religious beliefs are more ambiguous to the point of regular theism (mainly believing that there is a God and that all modern religions with one are can be considered equal to each other in terms of beliefs and overall value with life itself) than it is relating to regular Catholicism. Again, I don't know this guy at all, but I hope I made a compelling case proving that I am my own individual person and not someone's clone or puppet or whatnot.
In conclusion, I would like to say I hope I made a compelling case to be unblocked here moving forward. If I am, I promise to take whatever advice that may be in mind for me to consideration to make sure I never repeat this situation around here ever again. I never intended to be malicious towards anybody when it comes to anything I might have said in either my edits or summaries within my edits, and I'll make sure to watch my language towards anyone in question around here the next time that kind of thing comes up. Furthermore, other interests are in mind within my life, and I would hate to not help any of those other interests out just because of some stupid lapses of judgment on my end. Hopefully I made a compelling case in my favor. If I hadn't, I perfectly understand and will leave it at that. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:39, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pinging NinjaRobotPirate and SportingFlyer, who made comments at ANI about you possibly being a sock of A Great Catholic Person. FWIW, I don't see much the similiarity in behavior, but them I'm not that familar with Catholic.—Bagumba (talk) 02:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: IPs, the simple question is why do you edit logged out when you have a registered account?—Bagumba (talk) 02:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First, thanks for that. Second, if I'm being honest, I think part of it is just plain laziness on my end. I know it's not the best excuse on my end, but it genuinely does relate to just plain being lazy sometimes. If you want something that feels more tangible, it's honestly just something I thought at the time was something that felt completely optional on my end, with the account only being absolutely necessary if it felt like it had to be, like for protected pages. After all, some of that was what I thought was mainly for anyone to edit was where I could edit something good for a page and it would be useful without having a direct credit at hand there (provided it doesn't require an addition source or two for citation purposes, of course). Seriously, imagine the awkwardness of editing something positive for the San Antonio Spurs or Los Angeles Lakers when you're primarily a fan of a team that you'd consider to be heated rivals. That's the kind of thinking at hand for at least those particular pages in mind. As for other pages, well the only real incentive besides editing protected pages is the fact that sources can be added without any CAPTCHA insertions, which a.) are very easy to figure out and b.) can sometimes be unintentionally funny, hence why I honestly didn't mind not logging on most times. Again, I apologize for any negative connotations at hand in relation to not logging on while being in other operating systems or locations. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I blocked you for your extensive and abusive logged out editing. I did not block you as a sock of A Great Catholic Person. I am familiar technically and behaviorally with AGCP, and there is no question in my mind that AGCP is a different user.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough, though I do thank you for recognizing me as a proper individual and not a sock puppet. Still, I hope to make a proper case to show myself as worthy of an unblock. :) – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Independent of socking, can you also address the editing behavior concerns raised in the original post at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1006#WP:RSBREAKING and WP:EDITORIAL by User:AGreatPhoenixSunsFan? Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 02:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It's in relation to the WikiProject talk about the Phoenix Suns, correct? If so, I think I can answer that by saying most of that was probably at a way too huge size in regards to responding back to anyone properly. I mean, with something like this, I'm honestly okay with responding back to people since it's only just one (or two) people at a time. However, when a subject has already been given tons of discussion and it doesn't feel like there would be anything worthwhile that I could say in regards to what might have gone on, I guess I just thought the best bet on that end was to not play at all. I mean, I had already edited in other places beforehand, and I figured those edits in those other places would be enough to showcase that I'm still good in your minds. Granted, I should also admit the past few years haven't been kind to myself as a whole, never mind my favorite team in the first place. It's possible events relating to my own personal failures from these past few years might have affected me on that end as well. Hopefully that's considered a reasonable explanation at hand for behavioral concerns. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 03:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - If you actually read the discussion, it is far more about your on-going unsourced, or poorly sourced, edits, which is also the reasons you have been blocked in the past. Most recently, edits such as this edit yesterday stating the Jazz had clinched a playoff berth when in fact they were still a win or Kings loss away (which was WP:NOTCRYSTAL, even if they did clinch tonight), or this edit that stated the Lakers had fired their coach when they had not (which even if hidden as a comment is still unencyclopedic). It also talks about your usage of Wikipedia as a fan blog and overuse of WP:EDITORIAL phrases. Honestly, if you truly have that much emotional attachment to a subject that your tone cannot be made neutral, it may be best to step back from editing that subject for a bit (please read WP:WIKIVOICE and MOS:WORDSTOWATCH). Yosemiter (talk) 03:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ah. I get you now. In the case of me thinking Utah already got their playoff spot yesterday, I was mainly looking off of records alone. That was because of the Los Angeles Clippers having the same record as the Utah Jazz at that time, which was 45–30. As for the Luke Walton firing, I admit that was definitely presumptuous on my end! That is something I have no convenient excuse for, even if one does believe Luke Walton is indeed going to be fired after this season's done with. And yeah, I guess I do use some websites a bit more often than others, even though I have little reason to trust ESPN properly these days. Regardless, I do want to try and fix up that editorial situation of mine as best as I possibly can for next season. (I mean, I could do that, but the regular season does end by April 11, and it'd be a bit difficult to prove I can change the editorial problem wherever it might come up.) Of course, considering the regular season is just about over with, it's nearly too late to say I would change that attitude downright immediately before the end of the season came up. So you know what? Maybe this off-season would be the best time and opportunity for me to do what you said in taking some time off there until around maybe May, if not near the end of June. I mean, it's not like any genuine changes are going to come up between now and the upcoming 2019 NBA Draft there (besides the lottery selection reveals and obvious playoffs), am I right? – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 04:16, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The blocked user was asked more than once to add sources, to stop adding speculation and/or breaking news, to look at the words he use when making an edit, to stop using contractions and be neutral among other things, but continued to edit in the same manner despite his promises to change. If he failed in the past (I lost count of how many times everyone advised him) then why should other editors think that it will change this time (he has already been blocked three times in a span of one month back in November/December 2018 with the last block being extended)? In addition, editor's personal problems should not be taken into account, because they are not related to Wikipedia, and if they impact his editing then no edits should be made at all until personal stuff is sorted out. – Sabbatino (talk) 15:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]