Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 216
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 210 | ← | Archive 214 | Archive 215 | Archive 216 | Archive 217 | Archive 218 | → | Archive 220 |
File:Grammy_recognition_awarded_to_Fernando_Garibay_for_The_Fame_Monster,_Lady_Gaga.jpg
- File:Grammy_recognition_awarded_to_Fernando_Garibay_for_The_Fame_Monster,_Lady_Gaga.jpg. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Ticket:2015102810021299 asserts that this is a self-portrait, and contains a CC-BY-SA-3.0/GFDL release. -Storkk (talk) 10:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- This image is not a self portrait of anyone. Instead it is a reproduction of a certificate from National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences. Fernando Garibay would not own the copyright on this certificate, so unless NARAS sent the ticket email, copyright is not proved released. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Thanks! I have informed the ticket submitter. Request withdrawn Storkk (talk) 11:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
File:BBC Radio 1Xtra logo.svg
The logo was for some reason replaced with File:Bbc 1Xtra logo.jpg by a BBC employee[1] but the new logo has info missing and will end up being deleted by next week, So I was hoping if this image could be undeleted? (If both logos are different I'll then reupload the new one correctly), Thanks, -–Davey2010Talk 03:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done it is slightly different, but may actually be a PD-simple case. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Brilliant thanks Graeme much appreciated, –Davey2010Talk 14:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Georgian Sinfonietta
I, Kote kas, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kote kas (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Zenon Software
I, CD33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CD33 (talk) 15:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:36, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph F. Rinaldi
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Qfaadvsr (talk) 17:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- This is the Draft they would like restored Draft:Joseph F. Rinaldi. JMHamo (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
File:A Charlie Brown Christmas trade ad.jpg
It was used in A Charlie Brown Christmas article, but someone replaced it. I really want to add it as a second image temporarily as either infobox image or section image. -George Ho (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done Use it or it will go again! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Team Pandemic
Requested userfication, admin who deleted the page, User:El C, does not seem to be an admin anymore -Prisencolin (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done, Prisencolin, you can find this at User:Prisencolin/Team Pandemic. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:31, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Arrick Value Model
I, Emcneil, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Emcneil (talk) 20:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Matt Secor
I Feel the page was wrongfully deleted due to other Users stating he held no top tier fights and those were not true facts -JMichael22 (talk) 01:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Secor, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lohre & Assoc.
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lohre & Assoc. Page name goes here · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
We are continuing to add citations to the article. The reviewer didn't respond to my explanation of the golden rule and notability. -Chucklohre (talk) 15:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done. This was chock full of copyright violations from numerous locations, such as here, here, here, here and here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Unwoman
No reason given for deleting this page of a notable musician -Blackfyr (talk) 05:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done. @Boleyn and Blackfyr: Hello Blackfyr. That's not true. There was a reason given: "I couldn't establish that she meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years, unresolved." However, since this was deleted through the proposed deletion process as uncontroversial, and without a discussion on the merits, undeletion is also considered uncontroversial and normally done pro forma, so I have restored. However, please note that this does not mean it will not be nominated for deletion under another process, e.g., at articles for deletion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Now at WP:Articles for deletion/Unwoman. Boleyn (talk) 17:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Roxanne O'Connell
I, Roxanneoconnell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Roxanneoconnell (talk) 18:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:refundDraft:Roxanne O'Connell Would like to reestablish this article and add material -- subject is published author, recording artist, and mentioned in other wikipedia article}}
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Romulan-Vulcan cultural split
I, Clash Ion, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Clash Ion (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Florida Basketball Association
I, TheScottDL, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheScottDL (talk) 21:20, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @TheScottDL: see this at Draft:Florida Basketball Association. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Bitchy resting face
I request the revision history of Bitchy resting face be grafted to the beginning of Resting Bitch Face. They are synonyms. Geo Swan (talk) 23:26, 13 December 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 23:26, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done restored (non-copyvio stuff) and redirected, feel free to use what you need from the history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Cash Savage
I, Moodleton, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Moodleton (talk) 01:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I intend to complete this article in the next 30 days -- I've contacted Cash Savage herself and she'll be assisting me for accuracy. -Moodleton (talk) 01:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cash Savage
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cash Savage · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Moodleton, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Moodleton (talk) 01:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done This was moved to Draft:Cash Savage and has been restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Music Theatre Wichita
{{subst:refundMusic Theatre Wichita Page was deleted without opportunity to improve; contributor who deleted claimed POV was not neutral and that page was promotional. Staff at the organization did not create the original page, but possible to make the page neutral and not promotional}}
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. see Music Theatre Wichita. Without a signature I have unable to give you credit for the challenge though! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Boston City Fc
Still learning how to properly use Wikipedia -Vomengao (talk) 17:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Probably non-notable and will go to AfD if restored. JMHamo (talk) 18:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done. Hello Vomengao. If an article is warranted – that is, one that would demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing to reliable sources that are secondary in nature and entirely unconnected to it, with all verifiabile content, written in a neutral manner and contain no original research – the prior versions are not the content we would want.
This has been created and deleted multiple times at various names:
• First in July 2015 at Boston City Football Club – where it was deleted as failing to assert any importance under section section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion ("CSD"), and as blatantly promotional under CSD G11 (and it was also a blatant but undiscovered copyright violation);
• Then at Boston City Fc, the page you've targeted – where it would have been subject to CSD A7 but the creator blanked it so it was deleted on that basis, but was again an undiscovered copyright violation
• Then at Boston City FC, where it was again deleted under G11, and yes, was once again a copyright violation (of this site).None of this prior content is useful for any possible article. You may have nothing to do with these prior versions, but please note that besides the summary above of applicable policies an article needs to comport with, you cannot take previously written, copyrighted text and paste it here. As we often tell people: "You may use external websites or other writings as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words" (to be clear, you can use short quotes, marked as such with quote marks, cited using an inline citation and in-text attribution, but must not engage in the copying and pasting that tainted all prior versions, much of which was unsuitable content anyway). Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done. Hello Vomengao. If an article is warranted – that is, one that would demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing to reliable sources that are secondary in nature and entirely unconnected to it, with all verifiabile content, written in a neutral manner and contain no original research – the prior versions are not the content we would want.
Dyslexia Association of Singapore
I, Daspp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daspp (talk) 02:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Daspp: I restored this back in June and no one lifted a finger to work on it. What do you want to do to improve it this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Planning to edit it with cited sources, previously I had cited newspaper sources but it seems they werent verified? Also more updates on the history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daspp (talk • contribs) 03:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Dyslexia Association of Singapore Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Mary's Pence
I, Gracegarv, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gracegarv (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Article for creation abandoned because 6 months passed without edits. I'm now ready to edit. -Gracegarv (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Cheng Hsin
I, 95.149.167.38, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 95.149.167.38 (talk) 09:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Cockburn Works, (Vogue Bathrooms) Falkirk
I, Bancquo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bancquo (talk) 10:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Charles Burns Upton
Article should not have been deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayloeb (talk • contribs) 15:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Rayloeb: Done. The article was only deleted because you placed an "author requests deletion" tag on it. JohnCD (talk) 18:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Amanda Mathew
Please userify this article (not to my userspace but to the userspace of the student who wrote it--K24smith). The student would like to attempt to re-work it and the prof would like some record of its creation to grade the student. Thanks so much! -Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Adam (Wiki Ed): @K24smith: Done to User:K24smith/Amanda Mathew, but I will ask the student not to post it again directly but to submit it for review via WP:Articles for creation. The deleting admin wrote "non-notable junior officer, one highly partial source" and indeed it read like a PR piece for the Marines, not surprising when the only source was the Marine Corps Times. JohnCD (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks JohnCD. They won't resubmit unless and until the issues are fixed. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Salapungan National High School
I, AnthonyNuarin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AnthonyNuarin (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
I am sick for months. The article was deleted. -AnthonyNuarin (talk) 02:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. We are looking for reliable independent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Annette Markham
I, Simona-st, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Simona-st (talk) 08:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Markus Zohner Arts Company
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ophelia-sonnenschein (talk) 17:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Creating Draft:Markus Zohner Arts Company
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Hoyland Common Athletic F.C.
Asked for this to be deleted by mistake sorry! - this club is notable as they have competed in the FA Cup Kivo (talk) 21:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done Adding some references would be good! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Abd al-Muhsin al-Libi
I request the original revision history of Abd al-Muhsin Al-Libi be grafted to the beginning of the current Abd al-Muhsin Al-Libi article. Talk page too please. -Geo Swan (talk) 06:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Geo Swan: done. I merged the history of Abd al-Muhsin al-Libi (lowercase "al") (which went from 2006 to 2011) to the history of the existing newer article Abd al-Muhsin Al-Libi. Did this for the talk pages too. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Amanda Duval
Aduvali86 (talk) 02:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Daniel Kobe Ricks Jr
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alfredo Armamdo Pacho (talk) 07:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Alfredo Armamdo Pacho: The page is at Draft:Daniel Kobe Ricks; it has not been deleted. JohnCD (talk) 12:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:European Association of Aerospace Students
I, JGG13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JGG13 (talk) 08:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- @JGG13: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Case Luggage
I, AndrewStocker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AndrewStocker (talk) 10:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- @AndrewStocker: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
The World's second oldest profession
The contributor who placed a prod on this article failed to honor the usual courtesy of leaving a heads-up on the article creator's talk page, so please include the revision that shows that prod placement. I think they failed to comply with WP:BEFORE, as well, as a web search shows copious potential references. I am going to request userification of the article, and its talk page, as it was deleted years ago, when inclusion criteria were less stringent, and I would like to make sure it measures up to the standards of 2015, before it is restored to article space. -Geo Swan (talk) 16:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. —Kusma (t·c) 16:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Archipelago films
I have not yet had the chance to edit my article based on the notes given for its rejection. However, I intend to edit it very soon and re-submit. Thank you. -74.89.86.96 (talk) 14:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Sustainability rating for transportation and other infrastructure
- Draft:Sustainability rating for transportation and other infrastructure · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Gmcvoy (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:The Comics Alternative
I, Donkepesh, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Donkepesh (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Patrice Bouchet
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Patrice Bouchet 21:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I understand and appreciate your concern. I want to let you know that the picture of mine (Patrice_Bouchet.png) which I tried to make appear in the page "Patrice Bouchet" and which seems to give problem (if I understood correctly) has been taken by me (or one of my son's?) and I hereby certify that it is absolutely free of any right (further, this kind of pictures should not be of any problem!). I have most certainly made a mistake when uploading it, and I would appreciate if you could tell me how to proceed... All the best, and many thanks in advance, Patrice Bouchet
- You need to go through our OTRS system to formally do that. We cannot take a random account's word for it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- I will mark this Not done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Adri Jovin
I, 117.240.224.78, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.240.224.78 (talk) 08:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user SimonP (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Nebraska Latino American Commission
I, Jasel.Cantu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Have more information now able to continue working on page, article originally deleted due to inactivity "Save page" button below -Jasel.Cantu (talk) 17:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Jasel.Cantu: since you have now edited it, the page is no longer in danger of immediate deletion. Please continue to edit it to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note that references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" are required to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 18:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
SmartFocus
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Emvfr (talk) 10:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC) Hello, i am the creator of the SmartFocus Wikipedia page which was recently deleted due to the subject not being notable.
The subject is notable, (www.smartfocus.com) and if you can un-delete the page and notify me of which sources were not sufficient enough and i can replace them with more sufficient sources.
Please let me know when the page can be undeleted so we can move forward with a more notable page.
thanks
Emvfr (talk) 10:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Emvfr: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartFocus, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Somehowjazz
I, 84.60.140.9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 84.60.140.9 (talk) 01:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
We'd like to submit our text with additional links -Esercar (talk) 01:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Theolution
I, 71.187.15.122, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I forgot about it but want my draft so I can work on it now that I have some time -71.187.15.122 (talk) 14:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
- I'm afraid I cannot hold out much hope that this can ever be an acceptable article, because Wikipedia is not a place to publish original theories - see Wikipedia:No original research, a fundamental policy. JohnCD (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:National Security Analysis Center
I, Subs99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Subs99 (talk) 11:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Subs99: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See the note on the draft's talk page, and see WP:STUB for advice on minimum acceptable content. JohnCD (talk) 15:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Saravanan Saran
I, Aadhitharajan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aadhitharajan (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Aadhitharajan: the article has not been deleted. A deletion tag was applied when it looked like this, but now that you have added material, the tag has been removed. Rather than posting new articles which are empty or have little content, it is a good idea to work on new material in a sandbox or a Userspace draft until there is enough material to make clear that the subject is important or significant enough to have an article. JohnCD (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Rebis Academy Of Technology
Before creating this page, Fred (one of the adminestrators) read this article and said no issue. You can see the history of this page and related talk page. I am eager to know where is the promotion word or sentence in my article and please let me know the specific comments instead of general guideline. This article is just introducing the institute like lots of other educational organization here. I can name several articles that promote their company, programs, services with comparing my article if needed. -Alireza.niakani (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Alireza.niakani: I have "userfied" the page - moved it to User:Alireza.niakani/Rebis Academy of Technology where you can work on it. It is not suitable in its current form, because all the references are to the College's own site and its social-media sites. As C.Fred told you, we need references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability, see also WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- No action necessary: article not deleted. While I agree that the article is not suitable in its current form, I do not feel that the article is in such an overtly promotional tone that CSD G11, spam, applies. I would also remind everybody that educational institutions are exempt from CSD A7, non-notable organizations and people. So, while the article is not subject to speedy deletion right now, it's probably good for it to remain in user space (or better, Draft: space) until there are independent sources. —C.Fred (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Thorold Public Library
Literacy2015 (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Literacy2015: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Keith McCullough
I, 69.123.92.77, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 69.123.92.77 (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Julian Lawrence
Article was prodded by an IP, but I was not notified before deletion. I've now noticed and would request it to be undeleted. If necessary, it can be discussed at AFD. I'm an administrator but I thought it would be best that an uninvolved admin review since I'm the creator of the article. -Jujutacular (talk) 22:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Robert Jordan
I intend to provide existing citations so that the page will be accepted. This is part of an ongoing project related to the publication of the artist's "catalogue raisonne." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.94.31.206 (talk) 01:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I've moved the article to Draft:Robert Jordan. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:36, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Latin Kaleidoscope.jpg
Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#File:Latin_Kaleidoscope.jpg has determined that this file is not original enough to be copyrightable - just text and a copyrightable element that falls under de minimis however. Unless someone here disagrees, the first and larger copy of the file that was deleted for NFCC#3 reasons should be restored. -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done One revision restored, the other revisions will be the same. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Solomon Moisevitch Sobol
I, 99.225.206.74, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 99.225.206.74 (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Tantiv4 Comment
No discussion on deletion took place, I belive WP:A7 applied wrongly. I request undeletion to be able to demonstrate significance (I am not sure if subject will be notable, but significant it certainly is. Thanks, -Sanjeev "ghane" Gupta 03:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Boing! said Zebedee (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- The article had no independent and reliable sources, which is necessary to show that the company is notable. On Wikipedia all articles must assert notability per WP:GNG or they will be deleted. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- I will concede the organisation and it s products ar not notable. But the tag applied was A7, which made it a CSD without disscusion. I have replied on Zebedee's user page, which I now think is the correct place to have done so. Thank you Sanjeev "ghane" Gupta 03:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghane (talk • contribs)
- I've explained further on my talk page and have offered to userfy if the author can provide some evidence to support the inclusion of this company. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
A N Nataraj Gowda
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -103.5.132.12 (talk) 06:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done. This is the English-language Wikipedia, but the article was written in Kannada. You can find the Kannada Wikipedia at https://kn.wikipedia.org, but note that articles about living persons need to cite reliable sources to verify what they say. JohnCD (talk) 10:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Pellenc Selective Technologies
I, 84.55.165.156, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. We will be working on this article in the next couple of months. -84.55.165.156 (talk) 07:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Lifeism
I, Kaetalist, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.
Reason: A book has now been published on this topic so is now known fact. Please reinstate page for editing. Kaetalist (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Kaetalist: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
- Before you put a lot of effort into this, please read WP:No original research ("If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it") and WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Neologisms. The draft says "the term Lifeism is not yet in general use" and also lists many different interpretations. If an article is to be accepted, it will need to show that a particular use of this term has achieved enough acceptance to have been discussed in reliable published sources outside the immediate circle of its inventors. JohnCD (talk) 11:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maulana Samiruddin Qasmi
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maulana Samiruddin Qasmi · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2.99.201.10 (talk) 20:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Polo Instructors and Players Association
I, 91.141.1.116, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The page has not been edited for six months. For this reason it was deleted before I could update it. Please undelete it -91.141.1.116 (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- What has been deleted was only the abandoned draft page. The actual article Polo Instructors and Players Association has not been deleted, and you are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 21:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
User:Azadzulfi/sandbox
I, Azadzulfi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Azadzulfi (talk) 23:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done This was incredibly promotional, so much so that it'd need a complete and total re-write in order to meet NPOV guidelines. I noticed that you'd also re-created it with what looks to be the same content, which I've deleted as unambiguous spam. It's also copyvio from here. I also noted that you moved Rankersbo's talk page to Wikipedia:Zulfi Azad, which is seen as vandalism. Given that your only edits have really been to try to promote yourself on Wikipedia, I'm going to block you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm guessing that the move was done in retribution for him declining your spammy AfC article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stasis Systems Australia
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stasis Systems Australia · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Neoprometheus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Neoprometheus (talk) 04:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done This was pretty promotional in tone, so much so that it reads like a press release. We can e-mail you the content, but I would highly, highly recommend that you re-write everything from scratch. Also, if you are related to the company and have a WP:COI, you need to disclose this, even if you're a freelancer or marketer that was asked to create the page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Template:Pnc
Deleted 2007, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:pnc. This remains a matter of ongoing WP:N / WP:GNG vs WP:SNG controversy/discontent. This template was active at a peak in the discussions in 2007, but as seen at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Mixed_messages the substance of the discussion continues. From my recollection (I watched more than I engaged), this template has substantial edit history, and possibly a significant talk page, that is a missing part of the discussion history that led to the WP:GNG. I would like access to this history. Would you please userfy for me, the template and its talk page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC) -SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:SmokeyJoe/Pnc. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
The Hideout
The page should be redirected to Hideout (disambiguation), where several articles with this name are listed (The Hideout (film), The Hideout Golf Club and The Hideout, Pennsylvania), all unrelated to the original "The Hideout" article about the radio show which was deleted via AfD and G4 between 2007 and 2008. -Cavarrone 07:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm going to redirect it to Hideout, since the disambiguation link just goes direct to that page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, the dab page is Hideout, I just wanted to underline it was a disambiguation page! Thank you. Cavarrone 10:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- I figure that I'll leave the page protection off given that the AfDs were so long ago and it's possible but unlikely that they'll come back after all this time to recreate the deleted pages. If they do, I can always re-protect. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Gabriel Ayala
Need to recite and improve the information -Feylinepresents (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. The page is complete unsourced nonsense. There is literally nothing there reciting. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Because it was n article about my website so anyone could know what is this website not kind of pormotion or advertising. Wikipedia is a place for information and knowing what is this and this so best idea was to let my website be known and anyone could know what is this website about he could go to Wikipedia where anything you want to know could find it there. "Save page" button below -Bumbleboss (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done This page was an advertisement. Also there is no indication that this topic is important for an encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Jaishankar chigurula
my page is a notably & good source i updated so meany references but still my page Jaishankar chigurula was tagged deletion policy please remove deletion policy tag on my page. -Teena D'souza (talk) 10:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Make your argument to keep it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaishankar Chigurla. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)