Mathematics desk
< September 9	<< Aug \| September \| Oct >>	September 11 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

September 10

Stellation of the 16-cell?

I'm trying to picture in my head why the Octahedron has a Stellation (Stellated octahedron) but the 16-cell, its 4 dimensional equivalent doesn't...Naraht (talk) 13:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Naraht: But it does, see this paper. The most obvious is the first stellation (which is a compound of two tesseracts). Double sharp (talk) 14:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Double sharp: I'm sort of surprised. Given that we have a great deal of information on the stellations of the 120 cell and 600 cell, I thought the lack of information on the 16-cell meant it didn't have one. The 5-cell and the hypercube obviously don't have them, I don't know about the 24-cell.Naraht (talk) 18:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, definitely a nice find. There's probably something worth adding to the article here; I'll try to take a closer look later. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Naraht: Well, surely the 600-cell has more stellations than what we show, if the icosahedron is anything to go by. The 24-cell definitely has stellations (the compound of 3 16-cells and the compound of 3 tesseracts are among them). Double sharp (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that it should be possible to devise an algorithm for enumerating the stellations of a given regular polytope. To get this right would be hard work, but it would be slightly surprising to me if no one has yet undertaken the effort. --Lambiam 07:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lambiam: It's been done by Robert Webb of the software Stella for the Platonic and Archimedean solids. The trouble is that in some cases the stellation counts get very high (well over a trillion). Nothing for 4D AFAICS. Double sharp (talk) 08:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar n-Space, Beyond the Final Frontier, Where No Algorithmician Has Gone Before. So 4D still has to be conquered. Might a combinatorial genius come up with a trick to count stellations rather than truly enumerate them? Also, presumably some (self-aggrandizements?) are more interesting than others. --Lambiam 09:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]