Entertainment desk
< February 28	<< Jan \| February \| Mar >>	March 1 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Entertainment Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

February 29

YouTube copyright enforcement

All Sabaton fans on YouTube are probably aware of this by now: in the past 2 months, many fan-made videos for their songs have been removed from YouTube on copyright grounds. What's interesting is that at this time, the enforcement efforts appear to disproportionately target videos for the song "Hearts of Iron" (and, to a lesser extent, "White Death") while leaving most other videos alone. Which begs the question: How do recording companies choose which videos to remove and which ones to leave alone? What criteria do they use to make this decision? (Also, a related question: I wonder why the copyright claims originate from Orchard Music -- I thought Sabaton were with Nuclear Blast Records? Or does Orchard own Nuclear Blast?) 2601:646:8E01:515D:986D:7DB1:2770:DAA7 (talk) 06:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From my YouTube experience, the copyright watchdogs mainly look for modern artists, those active in the 2000s. Sabaton is one of them, being active since 1999. Older recordings (including some films), made in the 90s or earlier usually pass the verification and are uploadable (even if formally they are still copyrightable). Brandmeister^talk 10:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In general, they seem to focus on music that is making money right now. The article The_Orchard_(company)#YouTube_programming may be interesting to you. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 12:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 2601:646:8E01:515D:F88D:DE34:7772:8E5B (talk) 07:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation Of Professional Footballer Michael Felgate

when will the page of michael felgate be created?87.228.221.236 (talk) 20:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: The article exists already, it is located at Michael Felgate. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 23:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are basically a bunch of unorganized volunteers, see WP:VOLUNTEER, so maybe today and maybe never. It is possible to request an article, see Wikipedia:Requested articles. But you are totally encouraged to write it yourself, I will leave some useful links on your talkpage. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 20:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are created by people who care and then create the article. That's it. If you care, and don't create the article, you can't count on anyone else doing it for you. --Jayron 32 20:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about the woefully unhelpful advice of the previous poster. If Felgate meets the pre-requisites of Wikipedia's football project's notability guidelines, then we can create it right away. Usually this means that Felgate will have had to have played in a fully professional game, e.g. the Premier League, the Football League, the League Cup etc. Can you provide us more information on Felgate's career to date so we could give you some feedback on the likelihood on an article being viable? The Rambling Man (talk) 21:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Here is his article: Michael_Felgate. It has been nominated for deletion. The page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Felgate is about a sports presenter with the same name. I looked at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Felgate (2nd nomination) and it seems that people doubt if he is notable (see WP:NOTABLE, WP:GNG and (like The Rambling Man said) WP:WikiProject_Football#Notability. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 21:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps there's an element of irony here that it's been nominated for "speedy deletion" for four weeks. Moreover the article about this footballer has been in existence for about four or five years. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but I don't dare claim that something is ironic anymore because of that stupid stupid song. Have you read the talkpage? User JohnCD wrote: "...the Cypriot First Division is now accepted as fully-professional in Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues...". He probably knows what he is talking about, so I have removed the not-so speedy deletion tag. Anyone can AfD it if they want to. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 21:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User JohnCD explained that he forgot to remove the speedy deletion tag when he restored the article. The consensus is that Michael Felgate is notable. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 00:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry for all this confusion, which is my fault. I fielded this request at WP:REFUND, read WP:Articles for deletion/Michael Felgate (2nd nomination), saw that the reason for deletion was that the Cypriot First Division was not then (2009) accepted as fully professional, checked WP:FPL and found that it is now accepted. So I restored the article. So far so good, but I but carelessly forgot to remove the db-g4 notice, hence all this. Self-trout. JohnCD (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]