Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Page extended-confirmed-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RUR)
"WP:PERM" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission or Help:Permanent link.
This page is under extended confirmed protection, but non-EC users may edit its subpages.

    Requests for permissions
    Shortcuts

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 19:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

    Administrators

    Full instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Autopatrolled

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:C1K98V

    Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That's good to know, because I have the same problem that Vanderwaalforces talks about. I will have to get back to this item. Schwede66 07:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Walco1

    Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:GanzKnusper

    91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AlphaBetaGamma

    I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AmateurHi$torian

    The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    +1 Good quality and appropriately sourced articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:MaplesyrupSushi

    Great editor, with high quality articles.Has written 32 live articles. Xiphoid Vigour ⚔Duel⚔ 15:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Hwqaksd

    I have created 90 articles, of which 81 are above stub-class and none deleted (to my recollection).

    I was previously denied autopatrolled permissions for not having enough articles that didn't go through AfC; I've since created 14 articles without utilizing it. Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:NaveenNkadalaveni

    —Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @NaveenNkadalaveni: (Non-administrator comment) Please add your reason for requesting autopatrolled rights. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:44, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Miminity

    I've created 37 articles main JP-related articles. Seven including Huwie Ishizaki appeared in DYK. (Though, I only discovered DYK later in July), Huwie Ishizaki is both WP:GAN and on queue in DYK (will release tomorrow when I'm writing this). None of my articles are deleted all of them are well-sourced.

    My earlier stuffs are a bit short (e.g. Shōgo Yasukawa, Yoshinobu Yamakawa) and the earlier pages I created are stubs (N56 highway (Philippines), Urdaneta–Dagupan Road). In total, 6 of my articles are stubs. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:41, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Mevoelo

    With over 45 live articles created, I believe that my experience on Wikipedia can positively contribute to patrol community. In addition, I believe that this right will also accord me more opportunity to grow. I hope i am given a chance. Thank you. Mevoelo (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Based on the XTools link in your nomination, you've had at least four of your creations deleted at AfD in the past six months for notability issues. That and your nomination statement leads me to believe that your work still requires scrutiny from new pages patrol. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Eiga-Kevin2

    I came across this user while reviewing articles in NPP. They are an infrequent new article author, but have a clear understanding of notability and reliable sources, in addition to being a major contributor to several quality articles. A few sparse concerns about the use of copyrighted images were quickly corrected when notified, and they have been invited to NPP previously. Reconrabbit 18:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    AutoWikiBrowser

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    User:Spartathenian

    Hi, I think this utility could be a useful aid in much of the maintenance work I'm doing, such as fixing CS1 errors and Harv/Sfn/ errors. Also, it may help me to search for common issues in the WP:AWSE list. I realise I'm still relatively new to the site, and you may prefer me to gain more experience before becoming AWB-registered. I am, however, professionally acquainted with similar utilities, and I fully appreciate the necessity of due diligence when using them. Any feedback is welcome. I'll keep a watch on the requests page. Thank you. Spartathenian (talk) 13:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC) Spartathenian (talk) 13:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cathodography

    Hello! I would like to request permission to use AutoWikiBrowser. While editing Wikipedia, I frequently check the Random Pages tool, and, sometimes, come across prose that contains typos or does not fully comply with Wikipedia's WP:MOS. I also frequently translate specifically Brazilian music-related articles coming across these same problems during translation. To help improve the quality of these articles and avoid tedious and repetitive editing, I plan to use Typos, General fixes etc. in AWB, but I will try to not heavily use it. I understand the importance of responsible editing and will review every edit I make rather than using the tool blindly. I will ensure that all changes adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thanks! Cattos💭 23:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Confirmed

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:88BeeGee88

    It has been four days and I've made 13 edits and I haven't been confirmed yet? 88BeeGee88 (talk) 06:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. Your account was created on 26 February 2025 at 21:09 (UTC). It will become autoconfirmed exactly 4 days after that time, which will be 2 March 2025 at 21:09 (UTC). Mz7 (talk) 10:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    i made my wikimedia account today , but username or IP address has been blocked Publeeshie (talk) 16:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Event coordinator

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Lastchapter

    I'm working with a group of students who may not have created an account prior to our meeting. We're working on articles related to Black history in St. Louis. 3/5/25, 4-6pm Lastchapter (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done stwalkerster (talk) 23:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lastchapter: On the assumption that "3/5/25" means 5th March and not 3rd May, and that "4-6pm" is in the Central Time Zone, I've granted this until the 7th for you even if it's a bit late (hopefully you still get some use from it). It's generally best to a) avoid ambiguous statements of date and time, and b) to request at least a few days in advance in future just in case someone doesn't see the request in time. stwalkerster (talk) 23:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Tashmetu

    I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([2]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 14:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JettM9104

    Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights I contribte to the wikipedia community. All of my edits have not been reverted in any way and I am experienced with wikipedia formatting by testing in my Sandbox. JettM9104 (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done Granting of extended confirmed to accounts with less than 500 edits is normally reserved for verified alternate accounts attached to users who are already extended confirmed on their main accounts. While editing certain articles may remain more cumbersome until you qualify for extended confirmed, we really prefer that you acquire the experience represented by completion of 500 edits before acquiring the privilege of extended confirmed. Best wishes on your continued contributions to Wikipedia. - Donald Albury 19:34, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    okay :) JettM9104 (talk) 14:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    File mover

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Mass message sender

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    New page reviewer

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Rahmatula786

    I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors.

    I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations.

    I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer.

    Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 17:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rahmatula786: What do you mean by though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time – did you have another account before this one? – Joe (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No Sir, Before creating this account, I used to edit Wikipedia anonymously and made various contributions. However, after realizing the benefits of having a registered account, I created this one and have since been actively editing and contributing regularly. Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) Why did you reject this submission?[5] topic is notable.. it's seems you don't have knowledge about notability guidelines. Hellorld4 (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I have replied on your talk page. Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:QEnigma

    Hello, I was granted New page reviewer rights for a period of two months on 14 January 2025, set to expire on 13 March. I would appreciate if this could be extended and made permanent. Thank you. QEnigma talk 01:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 13 March 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 01:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Ambrosiawater

    I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights to help patrol new pages, identifying spam, copyright violations, and promotional content while assisting new editors constructively. Ambrosiawater (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cinder painter

    I'd like to request the New Page Reviewer rights to better contribute to Wikipedia and reduce the backlog. I have been actively participating in AfC, AfD, vandalism reverts, draftifying, new pages patrol feed (e.g. adding templates, creating talk pages, helping with sourcing) and removing promotional or poorly sourced content. I also proactively respond to new users’ questions and requests regarding drafts and article creation (usually when I decline at AfC), explaining the basics of reliable sources, notability, and other key guidelines. Cinder painter (talk) 07:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:SK2242

    Would like to help with the backlog. I'm active in AfC reviewing and CSD'ing inappropriate pages. Previously held NPR in 2021 on a trial basis but didn’t do much with it so didn't reapply. SK2242 (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Page mover

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Abo Yemen

    Hello! I meet the basic guidelines for the permission and I think that I have a good history of RM participation and it would be nice to try and help out with something new. I don't have much to say in my head but feel free to ask questions! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Absolutiva

    I should grant page mover rights, after my previous proposal [6] does not meet requirements. Absolutiva (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had an account for 153 days. — MusikBot talk 23:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Pending changes reviewer

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Vellutis

    I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 18:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Thorn6130

    I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AgerJoy

    I would like to help in Reviewing pending changes as I'm familiar with all the policies and guidelines for RPC and I'm doing constructive edit regularly. AgerJoy 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Xiphoid Vigour

    Requesting rights to intervene against vandalism. I've been patrolling recent changes & have reviewed a lot of changes. I was declined last time as my account was new. I'm familiar with all the policies of vandalism and pending changes. Regards, Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 09:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBot talk 09:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ScrabbleTiles

    Hi! I edit Wikipedia quite frequently, particularly fighting against vandalism and I think that if I had this right, it would enable me to be a more helpful and better user. I would like to be able to confirm these requests as I think that it would just be another way for me to be helpful. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:WormEater13

    I have been a active contributor to Wikipedia for quite a few months now, actively editing and creating articles related to Texas politicians. I'm also well aware about the Wikipedia policy on vandalism. I see a lot of requests on articles that I edit miscellaneously in my free time, however I don't have the permission. WormEater13 (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 22:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Danoniinho

    I'm requesting Pending Changes Reviewer status so I can help speed up and decrease the number of pending changes to articles. I know the rules about vandalism, verifiability, editing guidelines, and everything else. Danoniinho (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Paradoxodarap

    Hello, I would like to request **Pending Changes Reviewer** rights. I have been an active editor since December 2020, with **1,094 total edits** (945 live). In the past year, I have made **345 edits**, primarily contributing to content creation, sourcing, and maintenance. I have created **154 articles** (121 currently live), ensuring compliance with Wikipedia's content guidelines. I am familiar with **WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV,** and other core policies. I aim to help review pending changes on semi-protected pages to ensure accuracy and reliability. Thank you for your time and consideration! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Stranger43286

    Hi. I'm Stranger43286. I has made 1000+ edits and reverted many vandalism. I also known Wikipedia"s core policies (NPOV, WP:V and more). Pending changes reviewer rights might be helpful for me. RealStranger43286 (talk) 08:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:HerBauhaus

    Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I've been an active contributor to Wikipedia, focusing on improving article quality, maintaining neutrality, and adding reliable citations. I'm well versed in core policies (NPOV, Verifiability, NOR) and understand the importance of pending changes. As someone who values data integrity in open-access knowledge, I prioritize accuracy and well-sourced content. One of my objectives is to help keep Wikipedia factual and trustworthy. HerBauhaus (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Rasteem

    I'm patrolling PendingChanges and RecentChanges on a regular basis. I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policies including (Verifiability, NPOV, BLP, OR, and also VAND - NOTVAND) and this right would help me to combat vandalism. I'm willing to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Ʀasteem Talk 04:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:TenshiSWR

    Hi, I'd like to request pending changes reviewer so that I can help out with the review backlog. I'm active both at CopyPatrol and in recent changes patrolling, and familiar with the relevant policies regarding reviewing pending changes (Copyvio, potential BLP issues, legal threats, personal attacks, and libel). Tenshi! (Talk page) 01:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:BarntToust

    I just think it'd be neat to take part in the process of reviewing pending changes! I have an understanding of good versus poor content, and gaining this right would be nice to exercise when I come across a needy page. BarntToust 01:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Rollback

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Coining

    There have been too many times when multiple rounds of improper edits/vandalism on pages I follow have required individual reversions, so having the rollback permission would be useful. Coining (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:SportscarFan2004

    I mainly edit on pages related to sportscar racing, where unregistered users often edit multiple small things (often going against the page consensus at the time) in the span of a few minutes. This role would be particularly useful to be able to rollback these edits at once. I check my watchlist multiple times a day and I am quite active in general. Thanks for your time. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Oostpulus

    I request rollback rights. I need rollback rights to more conveniently eliminate vandalism in English wiki. In addition, I have rollback rights on Russian wiki and I am also actively eliminating cross-wiki vandalism. I have read the rollback policy and am ready to follow it. Oostpulus (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 125 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:E6400

    I am kindly requesting rollback permissions for myself, in order to revert vandalism using the Huggle tool. E6400 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ScrabbleTiles

    Hi, I requested for this right a few weeks ago, which MusikBot will flag up. The reason I was declined was mainly because I had not met the 200 mainspace edit threshold needed for my application to go through. A concern was also raised about one of my edits, saying that I had jumped to conclusions about an editor a bit quickly and had gone too fast with the warnings. I am now trying to be better at using the warning system more fairly and helpfully and I hope that I have addressed this concern. Most of my edits on Wikipedia have been fighting against vandalism and with this tool, I will be able to fight it more efficiently. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([10]). — MusikBot talk 17:10, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If it helps, I'd like to vouch for ScrabbleTiles. They've proved to be a good user, and I doubt that they would misuse either of the requested permissions.(Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 16:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:United Blasters

    I'm requesting rollback rights to enhance my ability to fight vandalism. I Would like to try out AntiVandal tool. I'm a Mobile user, so Rollback will be very useful for me. I'm active in recent changes, pending changes, and new pages patrol, and I understand rollback is for clear vandalism cases. I'll use it responsibly. Here is my Undo/Revert History : [11]

    UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cactusisme

    Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have made many reverts using undo and I use SWviewer/Twinkle to revert vandalism (see this to see my reverts). I understand the policies of rollback and have thoroughly read through the rollback policies and guidlines. I hope that I would receive the rights (permenant or for a probation period).— Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:WikiMentor01

    I usually manual revert edits and undo revisions, particularly in Nepal-related articles, where vandalism is more common. Having rollback rights would help me efficiently maintain the accuracy and quality of these pages. WikiMentor01 (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Swoonfed

    I've been editing on Wikipedia since May 2024, and often times see IP accounts or newly created accounts cause disruption, vandalism or spread misinformation across vital articles. I have to manually revert their edits most of the times. Since I have been working on improving and expanding a few high exposure articles, I believe rollback rights would give me a large boost in handling vandalism. Swoonfed (Ping) 14:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Ghent123

    Despite the fact that I took a somewhat lengthy Wikibreak, I've had over a month's experience of patrolling Recent Changes to combat vandalism. I have read WP:Rollback as well as have consistently notifying users of their reverted edits. I hope to use this tool so I can revert Vandalism more efficiently. With Thanks,  Ghent123  Communicate 06:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Galaxybeing

    I'll like to request for rollback rights. I have started patrolling recent changes since this year to remove any problematic edits. Having this tool can make the reverting process easier since it saves time consumption and therefore limits the chances of any accidental misclicks. Thanks. Galaxybeing (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Raph Williams65

    Hey, am requesting the rollback rights mainly for reverting vandalism or unconstructive edits as i've read and understood that one can use the rollback but for reverting vandalism. Thanks, Would be glad if granted. – Raphael (B//C) 02:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 188 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 03:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:TrueMoriarty

    I want to request rollback right for me to counter the acts of vandalisms in Wikipedia. I have more than 200 mainspace edits, I have reviewed pending changes for more than a month, I never consciously participated in any edit wars and I try my best to notify the authors of edits reverted by me whenever possible. TrueMoriarty (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Template editor

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
    Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions&oldid=1181725208"