Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Arachnis Picta
It seems to me an image of a high quality. My only concern is the out of focus forelegs in the foreground and background. Is it worth putting it for nomination in spite of this obvious flaw?
- Nominated by
- Mostlyharmless (talk) 04:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- On encyclopedic terms this picture is quite good to show the subjects and has substantial detail that's welcome in a macro. I do guarantee you that people will oppose the background for being white but to what degree I cannot say... I would probably try this at PFC to see if people enjoy it enough. About the leg being out of focus that's probably fine it's a minuscule part of the photograph compared to the part that is in focus. victorrocha (talk) 21:24, 2 july 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, nominated. Mostlyharmless (talk) 04:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Seconder