Wikipedia:Peer review/The Game (mind game)/archive1

The Game (mind game)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I spent roughly 2 hours making this edit to the article and I think it's as good as I can get it. Some sections may be a little too detailed or contain stuff that doesn't need a mention - I'd like a second opinion as to whether everything mentioned is relevant and notable. Following two quickly-failed good article nominations a few years ago, I'm trying to get this to GA status.

Thanks, Bilorv ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 10:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Forbidden User

This article needs expansion - even the shortest GA is more than one-third longer.

Define "long" - the second recently listed GAs I looked at, Volvopluteus michiganensis, is just 18 characters longer than The Game and is only 10,000 bytes. Bilorv ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "strategies" part should be expanded in particular.

Expanded - take a look Bilorv ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Reception" is another part that should be expanded.

Started to expand - probably could add a bit more Bilorv ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Overall: As it is not very notable, chances of making this GA is rather low. However, if you can do the expansion (and don't forget to request copyediting from WP:GOCE), you may actually work this out.Forbidden User (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought WP:GOCE is only for articles that have serious prose issues and need cleaning up. I didn't think it would apply to articles like this with (I would hope) reasonably good prose. Bilorv ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 19:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]