Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 March 26

< March 25	March 27 >

March 26

Image:Algis platoon.jpg

This image has disputed copyright status because

It was not published at all and the only source provided links to a forum.
It was not published in the USSR before 1954, hence it is not in PD and use of the {{PD-Russia}} tag is illegal.--Dojarca 08:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lokostadium.jpg

Copyright violation. The image is a copy of a photo from the official site: [1]--Dojarca 08:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cduffner.jpg

Image:Cduffner.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Cduffner (notify | contribs).

Orphan, Unencyclopedic. A personal picture I uploaded and released into the public domain. I wish to vanish. — Cduffner 00:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged for speedy deletion per CSD G7. --Iamunknown 00:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Grilled_cheese_cheesey.PNG

Image:Grilled_cheese_cheesey.PNG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Lockeownzj00 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, Grilled cheese sandwich already has two appropriate pictures Iamunknown 00:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michaeljosephhowell.jpg

Image:Michaeljosephhowell.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Michael Howell (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 00:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gatlind.gif

Image:Gatlind.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Gatlind23 (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 00:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nv8200p talk 02:04, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mock London Underground station plates

Following on from the Tyne and Wear Metro set, again serving no purpose other than visual styling. Chris cheese whine 00:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- As I commented on this uer's other proposed deletion, of Tyne and Wear Metro signs: Please do not delete images such as these from the article pages they appear on (using an anodyne edit summary) before you propose them for deletion, or if you do, mention this IfD in the articles to which the images belong. Otherwise other users will never learn of the proposed deletion, and it will appear to be a bad-faith nomination. ProhibitOnions ^(T) 11:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem here? Visual styling isn't bad. Keep. Lupo 10:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? My bad. For a moment there I thought we were building an encyclopaedia ... Chris cheese whine 02:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. These images use a typeface (Johnson) designed specifically for the Underground and otherwise not widely available. A nice touch. ProhibitOnions ^(T) 11:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please clarify precisely why this is a valid reason for keeping the page, and a worthy response to the claim of UE. Chris cheese whine 00:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. For the same reasons as other proposed deletion, of Tyne and Wear Metro signs. DrFrench 11:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Quoting from this discussion, "" offers no real advantage over "West Ham". Furthermore, (as I have already stated elsewhere) I agree with those that say that the station name in the infobox should be in text rather than an image, in case the image server is having a bad day, or a reader can't display the image for another reason. Unlike the Tyne and Wear Metro badges, these do not conform to the style used in actual London Underground signs, so that reason for keeping them does not apply, and in this case I can't think of a suitable home elsewhere in the station articles. I appreciate that whoever created them put a lot of hard work into it, but in short, I can't think of a use for them, so they should go. --RFBailey 20:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:TGL2.jpg

Image:TGL2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by The Grey Level (Band) (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, LQ. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 00:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IMGP1100.JPG

Image:IMGP1100.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by The Grey Level (Band) (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, LQ. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 00:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stuff 006.jpg

Image:Stuff 006.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jenbeau (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 01:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WOL 010.jpg

Image:WOL 010.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jenbeau (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 01:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jongis.jpg

Image:Jongis.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jongilanga (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 01:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1542372727 l.jpg

Image:1542372727 l.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by PTong (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 01:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Barrasunday.gif

Image:Barrasunday.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Barramundi Sundi (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 02:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Barramundisundi.jpg

Image:Barramundisundi.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Barramundi Sundi (notify | contribs).

UE, AB. Used only at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-11-01, where the request was declined. — Calton | Talk 02:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cowy at the beach.jpg

Image:Cowy at the beach.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Thomash (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Painting by uploader, used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 02:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted Rockland County shield images

File:Rockland County Route 38.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 23.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 60.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 30.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 73.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 86.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 90 NY.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 35A NY.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 29 NY.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 64 NY.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 93 NY.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 89 NY.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 46.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 11.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 85.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 52.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 35.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 15.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 72.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 108.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 94.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 47.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 65.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 118.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Rockland County Route 112.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

All low quality, orphaned, and non-standard (should be SVG), obsoleted by Rockland County Route XX NY.svg -- NORTH ^talk 02:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image:Myfamily.JPG

Image:Image:Myfamily.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Shantanuo (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 04:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image:Shantanu.jpg

Image:Image:Shantanu.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Shantanuo (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 04:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image-Malakoff Sendirian Berhad logo.png

Image:Image-Malakoff Sendirian Berhad logo.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Two hundred percent (notify | contribs).

Obsoleted by Image:Malakoff Sendirian Berhad logo.png. Typo. — Two hundred percent 06:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:47sqgyp.jpg

Image:47sqgyp.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Babycakes46743 (notify | contribs).

Orphan plus image probably not put on wikipedia with pictured person's consent. A problem given the content of the picture and thus this needs to be removed ASAP — Bigtimepeace 06:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Caledfwlch_gold2.jpg

Image:Caledfwlch_gold2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by FelsenVonEngland (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Bigr Tex 15:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chan_Chuan_Chang_Metal_Works_logo.gif

Image:Chan_Chuan_Chang_Metal_Works_logo.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Chan Chuan Chang Metal Works (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, image used only on now-deleted spam page. RJASE1 ^Talk 16:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 16:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PenAgain_1.jpg

Image:PenAgain_1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Thermaldynamics (notify | contribs).

Low quality — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kennunoo.jpg

Image:Kennunoo.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Ken Nunoo (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image deleted as has been replaced by Image:Andrew Van De Kamp Screenshot.JPG. WjBscribe 23:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Andrewvandekamp.PNG

Image:Andrewvandekamp.PNG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by DrBat (notify | contribs).

OB, OR, UE and CV, obsoleted in that a much more representative image is used within the article (actually shows the character, and not just the actor posing). Orphaned in that it has no transclusions. Non-encyclopaedic due to not representing the character at all, firstly it's a pose, secondly the character has never appeared in a scene like that, thirdly it's utter crap for representing a fictional character. Copyright vio as there's nothing to prove it's a "publicity photograph" (ABCs TOU explicitly state there content is for personal use, only.) — Matthew 17:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How is the previous image more representative? Is he doing anything?
- And the image shows how he currently looks like; the other image is from the previous season. He's older, and has a different haircut, for starters.
- Both images are promotional photos; see [2] and [3]. --DrBat 19:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on the grounds that it has no transclusion because the one article it may be used fairly on is Andrew Van De Kamp, from where it has been removed pending this discussion, that both images are publicity photos of Shawn Pyfrom in character, which is backed up by the fact that this Downloads section contains the same shot but as a desktop wallpaper, and is clearly labelled Andrew and is intended to be such (note all the other images are also similarly labelled as their characters and are dressed and posing as their characters), and backed up by the fact that Shawn Pyfrom in real life does not look like that when he is not filming (see his IMDB gallery). The image is representative because it is a promo shot for the beginning of Season 3 - the other image is a shot from either Season 1 or the end of Season 2 (and the fact that I cannot tell which lends further weight against as being "representative") - anyone who has watched Desperate Housewives knows that this image is what Andrew now looks like. Anyone seeing the previous image and then watching A Weekend in the Country, for example, would notice that Andrew looks quite different. The fact that the same shot, if not the image uploaded, is in a downloads section should tell you all you need to know about its useage for publicity. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Old example of a character image Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 20:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To DrBat and Dev920: thanks for providing those links. I must be missing something; where on those pages does it indicate that the image is licensed for promotional use by anyone? --Iamunknown 18:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It doesn't, but the fact that it's in the downloads section as a wallpaper and turns up on other websites that have presumably asked for an image suggests that it's a promo shot. I was working on the principle that I read somewhere and can't find right now that we can use images in online press kits and for a fictional character, a wallpaper is his press kit. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 07:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I can't think of where that statement might be either, but I agree that, currently, the consensus on FU images on Wikipedia is that such promotional images for fictional characters are appropriate. An image taken from just any source, as this image appears to be, however, is not a promotional photograph. The image must come directly from, or must be known to have directly come from, a press kit. Unfortunately, most promotional photographs on Wikipedia are violations of this principle. If the image is to continue to be used, it must not be tagged with Template:Promotional, but with Template:Fair use in. If it is to be unused, then delete per WP:CSD#I5. --Iamunknown 19:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that's what it *was* tagged with. So if we change it, can I use it? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry for the mix up! Wait for an administrator to close this discussion, then we'll see. --Iamunknown 19:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What copyright information is known to make valid use of the fair use in tag? Matthew 19:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, we need to know who the copyright holder to use images without permission under fair use. I certainly don't know. Maybe we can figure it out. --Iamunknown 19:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's more then likely copyrighted to ABC (this is speculation - by me), it would require a citation however, I cannot provide this however as I don't know where to look. But that alone doesn't refute my other points to the IfD nomination, for example the non-character representation, basically he is *posing* for the camera, the previous one however shows him not making eye contact with the camera but with something else, and he's on Wisteria Lane - the end problem could to me be solved with a proper screen capture from an episode, there's no licensing dispute there, it would be a proper in-character shot, etc. Matthew 19:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, Matthew, those "points" have been refuted by both me, IAU, and Dr.Bat. The only reason the current image is used rather than the other image is that you've listed this image here. Now, I didn't know that we had the wrong copyright tag in or I would have changed it myself, but now I have your "points" against this image have no rational basis. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 07:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidly I don't believe you have. I have faith the closing sysop will make the correct choice about this image. Matthew 08:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have faith in them as wellIllyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 16:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, who is the copyright holder? I agree with Matthew that we must know who it is in order to use it without permission. Unless a citation is provided, it should be deleted. --Iamunknown 15:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.