User talk:Stevo D

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Stevo D, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are some tips:

First, follow the Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page, and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Learn what the proper tags to place on stubs (short articles) are.
Learn how Articles for deletion works.
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board.
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button.
Provide an Edit summary.
Read the Picture tutorial for help with images and remember to add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload.
Create a User page.
Be bold.
Ignore all rules.
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. There are also the help pages for self-help and the village pump and IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance. You should also feel free to ask me on my Talk page.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes(~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, however, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person. Again, welcome! —WAvegetarian•(talk) 04:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kokpar

Check out the link I added... - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New userboxes

I have deleted a userbox template you recently created, as userboxes should no longer be created in templatespace per the terms of the German userbox solution. Here is the userbox code so that you can recreate the userbox in your userspace ("userfying") if you wish.

<div style="float: left; border:solid #CD853F 1px; margin: 1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: #FFFFE0;"
| style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background: #CD853F; text-align: center; font-size: {{{5|{{{id-s|14}}}}}}pt; color: {{{id-fc|black}}};" | '''Civ'''
| style="font-size: {{{info-s|8}}}pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: {{{info-fc|black}}};" | This user is addicted to [[Sid Meier's Civilization]] computer game series.
|}</div>

--Cyde Weys 13:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Hello! I noticed you have tried to create a RFA. Are you sure you followed the instructions that appear here? If you wish to cancel the process, I guess you can either ask at the Talk page of the RFA page to delete it, or tag it with {{db-author}} (not completely sure about this last one). As a friendly advice, I tell you that most times, candidates with less than 1000 edits or 3 months do not usually pass. Whatever your decision, keep it up! -- ReyBrujo 05:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Shabba Ranks.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shabba Ranks.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 01:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

South African Farmer Murders

Hi Stevo!

Good to see some more voices on the liberal side of the Plaasmoorde debate. I'm sorry you think the article is so bad that it should be shot on sight. Maybe you can find some time to give it a once-over? It's always hard to build a consensus when you have to deal with radicals, because you end up compromising halfway between sense and insanity, which is not ideal. I don't have time to work on WP as often as I'd like, so if you feel I could help with anything, please drop me a mail. I read that most every day. --Slashme 12:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Odd edit

I can't see the point of [1], especially of the edit summary. Why? -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

happy is the wise man who acts like an idiot.J.L.Main 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Niyazov.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Niyazov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vallejo1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vallejo1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notifiying about a vote

Hello. The article Stereotypes of whites is being nominated for deletion. If you want, you could state your opinion here. Thank you. M.V.E.i. 11:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP meetup

	In the area? You're invited to
	San Francisco Meetup 3
	Date: September 16th, 2007
	Place: Yerba Buena Gardens, 3pm
	San Francisco Meetup 2

-- phoebe/(talk) 08:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sfconnect logo.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sfconnect logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —PNG crusade bot ^(feedback) 22:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sfconnect logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sfconnect logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Lisa Ray.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Lisa Ray.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mspraveen (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bathopele.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bathopele.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Women's history editathon

Hey - Sorry for the late notice, but since you have yourself tagged as living in the Bay Area, I thought you might appreciate notification that we’re having an event Saturday! It’ll be held at Hoyt Hall, an all-women's house of the Berkeley Student Cooperative from 3 to 6 pm tomorrow. The main event page is here. Anyone is welcome to show up, but we’re expecting a significant number of people to come who have literally never edited Wikipedia before. If you’re an experienced Wikipedian who would be able to provide useful help to some of the newbies, your presence would be especially appreciated (and it might be a good idea for you to show up at 2 or 2:30 instead of three. Thanks, Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2013 (UTC) I’m AWB’ing this message to all Wikipedians who have tagged themselves in the bay area. I’m sorry if the message isn’t of interest to you; feel free to delete it. I’ll be unlikely to send future messages in a similar way, but if really don’t want to receive future messages of this sort, please let me know. [reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history at Fake News shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Fake News

Your edit looks pretty good to me. 7 sources (!) Can't beat that. I've restored it. I anticipate someone may take it to the TP. XavierItzm (talk) 14:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

America first

Please do not remove sourced content. If you object, please discuss your objections on the talkpage. Also mind WP:BRD and WP:3RR. Thanks. Kleuske (talk)

It's not relevant to the article, which is about Trump's foreign policy in particular, not America First in general. Stevo D (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not up to you to decide what the article is about. You made a bold edit, it got reverted (twice), so please take it to the talkpage. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 12:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is literally titled 'America First (Policy). Seeing as 'America First' was never a policy until Trump, what can it possibly be about? Stevo D (talk) 12:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hi! I just wanted to inform you that on the Lauren Southern article—the article in which you tried to keep the transgender writer tag—the issue has previously been discussed, and the consensus was that the transition was fake and that masculine pronouns are to be used. Thanks! RileyBugz ^{Yell at me} | _Edits 03:20, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The issue pertains to gender pronouns, not to legal transition. Thanks! Stevo D (talk) 06:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

America First Edit-War

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cyrus the Penner (talk) 22:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "America First (policy)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 17 May 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 23:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning America First (policy), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 03:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Mooch

I am continuing this disagreement on the talk page. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Mooch. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Widefox; talk 09:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mooch. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Stop trying to force your edit at the dab and in future if someone reverts your edit, then use the talk page. Continuing to edit war may result in a block. It appears your edit is also a WP:BLP violation. Widefox; talk 09:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Stevo D. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stereotypes of West and Central Asians in the United States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stereotypes of West and Central Asians in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereotypes of West and Central Asians in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Lanarkshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edinburgh City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Neil S. Walker (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pee-wee Herman. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. I checked pages 56-59: not mentioned; simple text search didn't find "Mexico" anywhere in book Neil S. Walker (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ah Fong Village, Hawaii, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Neil S. Walker (talk) 00:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to South Lanarkshire. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Neil S. Walker (talk) 00:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tamarillo. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Neil S. Walker (talk) 00:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Colville Young. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Neil S. Walker (talk) 00:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

July 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kaffir lime. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bennv3771 (talk) 02:01, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Gazpacho. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You keep adding unsourced “alternative” names for food that also happen to be pejorative/racist terms. Any more of this and it will be blatant vandalism/trolling. Bennv3771 (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:V, you need to cite reliable sources. Citing unreliable sources (like blogs that clearly copy pasted the very same content from the very same Wikipedia article you are using it to verify) does not satisfy WP:V. Neither is citing reliable sources that do not actually verify your claims. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:49, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on San Ignacio, Belize. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:03, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Bambara language. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I read the pages 107-108 in your cited source and could not find any verification of your claims. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:05, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gazpacho. See WP:CIRCULAR Bennv3771 (talk) 04:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at San Ignacio, Belize. The talk page Talk:San Ignacio, Belize is blank, not sure why you directed me there. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:38, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tuxtla Gutiérrez. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stevo D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was hacked and just got control of it this morning when it was blocked indefinitely.

Decline reason:

If your account was hacked, it must remain blocked per WP:COMPROMISED. Please follow the procedure there to reestablish an account. 331dot (talk) 00:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.