Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Puri/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Consensus to keep from three editors. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
A GA from 2016. Minor amounts of uncited material though I am mainly worried about the entire transportation section being unsourced. Considering that section is important to have from a broadness standpoint, it should be addressed along with other uncited statements. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- It is nearly seven years since I got the article upgraded to GA and after that I had retired from Wikpedia. I am now back to editing since 3 January 2023.
- I have started fixing references to uncited paras. I have already done a few. Hope to the Transporation section fully soon. Nvvchar. 11:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have now fixed all the references for the transporation section. Pl let me know if iave left out any unreferencced section. Nvvchar. 13:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- It looks good though I would like for some other people to check and see if the article is GA status now. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have now fixed all the references for the transporation section. Pl let me know if iave left out any unreferencced section. Nvvchar. 13:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- At the lower end of the criteria, but it probably does meet them. On that basis, keep, although I would recommend putting the article down at WP:GOCE, Nvvchar. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Who should do it? The person who has put it up for reaasseemnt should do it, I suppose. Nvvchar. 14:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Doesn't really matter, just as long as some effort is being made to improve clarity and readability. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Who should do it? The person who has put it up for reaasseemnt should do it, I suppose. Nvvchar. 14:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.