Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Voyager approaching Jupiter

Original - Jupiter as seen from the Voyager 1 probe with blue filter, at a rate of one picture for every 10 hours. The small, round, dark spots appearing in some frames are the shadows cast by the moons passing between Jupiter and the Sun, while the small, white flashes around the planet, are the moons themselves.

Alternative - 600x600

Reason: This is one of the coolest animations in astronomy. It is historically important and quite informative.
Articles this image appears in: Voyager 1, Jupiter, Atmosphere of Jupiter
Creator: NASA/JPL

Support as nominator --Nergaal (talk) 07:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Diego_pmc ^Talk 08:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Is the color version available? This blue-channel version does show the bands and spots more clearly, though. --Janke | Talk 10:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow...but there seem to be a few specks that pop up, seemingly for only one frame. Are they moons (in which case leave them in) or transmissions errors/noise (in which case, can we clone them out)?--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 12:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They're moons and shadows of moons... --Janke | Talk 16:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah...can we add that to the caption?--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 22:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is it now? It might need some polishing. Nergaal (talk) 03:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Classic astronomy 'video' still gives me goosebumps, but as I commented at PPR I'd prefer the colour version that I seem to remember having seen (and Janke also mentions above). --jjron (talk) 12:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Per Jjron. Would support this and color version as two versions of the same picture (with preference to this). Mostlyharmless (talk) 08:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. What are the flickering white horizontal and vertical lines? Spikebrennan (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure but the NASA's release has them too - I would guess instrument artifacts? Nergaal (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support I mean, wow. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 23:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I saw the nom on Commons, and was going to ask Nergaal if he would nom. it here instead. —Ceran ♦ (talk) 23:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A bit of digging reveals that there's a significantly higher resolution on NASA's website, which I've uploaded. It does have some partly blank frames though, which look like they've been removed from the smaller version. Time3000 (talk) 08:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Removed images from display, as GIF thumbnailing has been turned off (you have to download the whole thing, then the browser resizes it). It's not a good thing if you have 10 MB of GIFs on one page. :) MER-C 11:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Very encyclopedic, accurately displays the subject in question, is a unique picture and clearly displays it's purpose. – Jerry^teps 10:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Great picture, of great historical value and an utterly fascinating subject. Constantine ✍ 17:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:790106-0203 Voyager 58M to 31M reduced.gif MER-C 06:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]