Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Robert Clotworthy
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2013 at 19:26:05 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/70/Robert_Clotworthy_headshot_cropped.jpg/260px-Robert_Clotworthy_headshot_cropped.jpg)
- Reason
- High-resolution and good quality portrait of a voice actor looking relaxed and natural.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Robert Clotworthy, Jim Raynor
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Robert Clotworthy (permission request and upload by User:Deskana)
- Support as nominator --Julia\talk 19:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - I don't like all that use of screen realestate for the image. Too much shirt not enough face plus he is very slanted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TechFilmer (talk • contribs) 19:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per TechFilmer. Unfortunate daylight-colored glare on glasses, which is probably (carefully) removable. And I could be wrong, but it seems his nose is in focus but his eyes aren't. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 19:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Alt added: Cropped (and slightly rotated anticlockwise). Really don't think the glasses glare detracts from the portrait. Julia\talk 20:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- I do, sorry (regarding glare). I also think there should be slightly more headroom, again per TechFilmer's comments. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support I don't believe in rigid portraits and quite like the composition on this one. The headroom can be increased in PS if it's a very big deal --Muhammad(talk) 03:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose original but support alternative version. The framing seems off to me in the original one, a portrait should have a larger portion taken up by the head. The alternative version looks good to me. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 08:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose both I think the flat lighting and brightness washes it out too much, far to flat of lighting, makes it less interesting then it could of been. — raekyt 14:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose The technical quality is quite good but I can't bring myself to support due to the flat lighting and aforementioned composition issues. I think a picture like this picture would be better at illustrating his profession as a voice actor (although that linked image is CC-BY-NC-SA which is not allowed here). dllu (t,c) 08:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 19:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)