Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/McEwen Bridge
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2016 at 19:29:44 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/09/McEwen_Bridge.jpg/534px-McEwen_Bridge.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/McEwen_Bridge_%28straightened%29.jpg/534px-McEwen_Bridge_%28straightened%29.jpg)
- Reason
- High technical quality and excellent EV for the location.
- Articles in which this image appears
- McEwen Bridge
- FP category for this image
- Places/Others
- Creator
- Óðinn
- Support as nominator – Óðinn (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support either Could be a little better centred, but it looks fantastic otherwise. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Agree, off center (not too fatal a flaw) and seems to be distorted somewhat (fixable). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support ALT - Looks nice once the distortion is removed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Support.--Explorer999 (talk) 08:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)- Striked !vote as Explorer999 doesn't has the necessary number of edits and account age to !vote. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Support ALT Looks a bit overexposed at full zoom - the branches appear almost bright white. But overall the picture works, and looks lovely. Preference of ALT due to successful improvement with the corrections... gazhiley 09:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral. I like the subject and the composition, but the biggest fault I can see is that it's way oversharpened. It hurts my eyes to view full size. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 16:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral I find myself very much agreeing with Diliff. At full res it's pretty bad. NativeForeigner Talk 22:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral – Jobas (talk) 14:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 21:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)