Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Katherine Johnson

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2016 at 11:41:57 (UTC)

Also, it's a nice action shot. OF MATH!

Articles in which this image appears: Katherine Johnson
FP category for this image: She's a mathematician, but she was applying that math to physics, so I think Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering makes sense.
Creator: NASA, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 11:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, she's worth another support. --Janke | Talk 14:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – 3 pencils + 1 calculator = minimalist. Bammesk (talk) 16:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Yeah, I think this picture worths it.MITB --- MITB_talk 09:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck as user isn't eligible to !vote. (was registered only 2 days ago instead of the required 25) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Jobas (talk) 10:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I feel that the picture needs to be cropped, so that the focus is on her. --Rainbow Archer (talk) 11:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I think pictures of people at their job add a lot of value that cropping tends to remove. If we crop it to her, it would tend to de-emphasise that she was a NASA mathematician. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 11:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Katherine Johnson at NASA, in 1966.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]