Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/HP Pavilion at San Jose

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2012 at 13:41:37 (UTC)

Reason: Sharp and clear well-composed image, with high EV
Articles in which this image appears: HP Pavilion at San Jose, Hewlett-Packard, List of attractions in Silicon Valley, San Jose, California
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: JaGa

Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 13:41, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Needs a better caption. Dusty777 16:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I changed the caption. That's what you meant? Tomer T (talk) 17:41, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I meant... Its more informative. Full Support. Dusty777 02:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Very sharp, high EV, and ... me wantee that camera Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dusty777 02:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great shot. J Milburn (talk) 12:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support e^xtra999 (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jkadavoor (talk) 06:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
oppose This is a stitched image so the high-resolution is to be expected. Indeed it is probably downsampled but I have no problem with that given that it is 20MP. Unfortunately the quality has deteriorated since the first upload. The second upload (apparently to fix stitching errors) has a significantly lower JPG quality and strong JPG artefacts are visible in the sky. In fact, even the first image would benefit from a higher JPG quality level to avoid gnats around high-contrast areas. The second upload involved a strong adjustment, presumably from this JPG, which is a no-no. This has just emphasised the JPG artefacts in the sky, which are visible even at normal screen resolution. This image could be rescued if the original photographer could upload a higher-quality JPG, along with the later adjustments that improve the levels. Colin°^Talk 22:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]