Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Campo flicker

Female campo flicker

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 May 2017 at 12:38:16 (UTC)

Reason: Illustrates article well. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Campo flicker
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charles (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support — --Marvellous Spider-Man 15:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – more of the tree trunk [1] improves the composition, IMO. Bammesk (talk) 13:38, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cropping is always a subjective matter which is why I try to upload the full image before cropping. If I made a wider crop, there would be many objecting: "too much tree trunk". It shouldn't really be an issue for FP. Also, the way that Wikipedia places images in the infobox means that a 'thin' portrait style displays very well and enhances the article - the whole idea behind the FP criteria. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see from the commons nomination that my opinion is in the minority. And agree with the subjectivity of it all. It is a very nice image and good EV, and good lighting. Bammesk (talk) 14:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support —Bruce1ee^talk 13:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - Don't wanna see this go down without concensus..-The Herald (Benison) • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 14:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Struck !vote cast after the voting period expired. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't reach the necessary quorum for promotion during the voting period. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]