Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/National Hero of Indonesia/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 10:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
National Hero of Indonesia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it is a good look at a very important subject for the Indonesia WikiProject. Indonesia's national heroes are an interesting bunch, although for the purposes of brevity the most "hooky" aspects of their lives aren't in this article. Did you know that Indonesian heroes...
- Promoted eating cats for better night vision?
- Asked for their heads to be cut off?
- Fought a guerrilla war with one lung?
- Starred in movies before becoming smugglers?
- Went to a girls' school despite being male?
There's another 151 more, just waiting for your review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from --Tomcat (7) 09:35, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments nice to see such lists! Here are my nitpicks:
|
- Support --Tomcat (7) 16:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Query We seem to have the photos of a significant number of these heroes. Why not incorporate them into the table?—indopug (talk) 12:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Short answer? Page load times. Assuming we have free images for half of them, 78 images is going to take a lot of bandwidth for people on slower connections (and will make the page even longer than it is now). For something like List of prime ministers of Indonesia, it's doable, but for a list like this I'd rather not impose too much bandwidth consumption.
- Also, although more personal, I think having half of them blank is not visually appealing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Another answer is that some photographs and depictions are a somewhat lacking in their original source and proof of first publication, which makes it difficult to ascertain their copyright status. —Arsonal (talk + contribs)— 20:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I should note, however, that I'm 100% certain that the images used here are PD or under a CC license (I got most of these myself, from PD newspapers or banknotes) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Bald Zebra (Talk) 09:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
I'll give this a full look when I can (my wife's particularly interested in this list as she's Indonesian and knows a few of these people through her family!), but I have three comments to make straight away: -
More to follow, hopefully. ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 13:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just three more comments:-
-- Cheers, ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 11:19, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Bloom6132 (talk) 02:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
—Bloom6132 (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – meets all criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. Hope you enjoyed the read! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all done, Indonesia Raya! ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 09:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - not finding anything worth opposing over; some redirects, but they all look plausible. The references in the lead paragraph ending in Proclamation of Indonesian Independence are out of order ([4][3][6]). But all in all, looks great. --PresN 20:10, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I got that one issue. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – "National Hero of Indonesia is a the highest-level title awarded in Indonesia." Stray "a" in the first sentence. Can't believe four supporters missed this, but maybe they were looking elsewhere.Giants2008 (Talk) 00:33, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- D'oh. Four supporters and Microsoft Word's spellcheck. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:38, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The typo was not there when I reviewed it.--— Tomcat (7) 09:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Introduced here (after your review), which explains why Word missed it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.