Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Alastair Cook/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 14:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of international cricket centuries by Alastair Cook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Zia Khan, The Rambling Man (talk) 00:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Alastair Cook is one of the best Test batsman in the history of England cricket. Zia Khan is very excited nominating this one. In fact, we have another similar list at FLC right now which "has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed" there. Zia Khan thinks that can nominate this list. The Rambling Man is interested in improving the list, so has the co-nomination. As always, look forward to the comments/sugesstions from anyone, especially FLCers. Zia Khan 00:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from —Vensatry (Ping me) 10:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
—Vensatry (Ping me) 09:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
More comments
—Vensatry (Ping me) 08:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Meets the standards. —Vensatry (Ping me) 10:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Crisco 1492 (talk) |
---|
*Comments by Crisco 1492
|
- Comments from me addressed. Waiting for Vesantry (who seems to know much more about cricket) to finish weighing in before I support. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ahhhh! thanks for your compliment :) —Vensatry (Ping me) 16:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Its amazing! Have you really seen this right now? Zia Khan 16:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, thanks for the comments, BTW! Zia Khan 05:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support on prose. Looks solid. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, thanks for the comments, BTW! Zia Khan 05:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
ICC should be spelled out in the first paragraph.Reference 8 needs a publisher (Wisden).Giants2008 (Talk) 01:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Zia Khan 16:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Jujutacular (talk) 01:24, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support Great list, I couldn't find any issues with it. Jujutacular (talk) 01:24, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No problems I can see. Chamal T•C 16:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the support. Zia Khan 18:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.