Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Ecuador/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of World Heritage Sites in Ecuador (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Tone 07:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ecuador has 5 WHS, including the Galapagos Islands, and 5 tentative sites. Standard style. The list for Egypt has just been promoted, the list for Brazil is seeing support, so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 07:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Alavense
[edit]- and the City of Quito - Is that capital c needed?
- There's an extra space between the lede and the first section.
- Galápagos tortoise, Galapagos penguin - Should be Galápagos in both instances.
- from the 18th century and from the 19th century, when the city was modernized - I guess the reiteration of from the is needed because the modernization only took place in the 19th century? Anyway, I think it reads a bit odd.
- Why are some sites' names translated when others aren't? What's the rationale behind that?
- A move forward came the second half of the 19th century - There's a preposition missing there, isn't there?
- where stoneware - There's a comma missing before where.
- {{commons}} should not be used on its own in the External links section. It would be better to use {{Commons-inline}}.
That's what I saw, Tone. I've got a couple of nominations going on, in case you have time and fancy having a look at them. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 08:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed all, thanks! As for translations, at some point I thought that using non-English names if in the source was better but have since changed my mind, after all, the reference has the original name anyway. Happens often especially with French-speaking countries. Fixed the rest. I'll have a look at your nominations soon if time allows. I know I should be doing more reviewing myself... Tone 20:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the edits. Nice work. Keep these lists coming. :) Support. Alavense (talk) 07:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image and accessibility review by Arconning
[edit]- Accessibility
- Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time.
- Images
- File:Ecuador location map.svg - GNU FDL
- File:Bartoleme Island.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
- File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 154.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
- File:Sangay2.jpg - Multiple licenses which are suitable
- File:Domes of the New Cathedral in Cuenca, Ecuador.jpg - CC BY 2.0
- File:Jujuy Sección Quebrada Grande-Las Escaleras, Foto 1 (14960178156) (2).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
- File:Ecuador aguablanca sulfur laguna.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0 FR
- File:Puyango fossil tree 02.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
- File:Vista de Zaruma.jpg - Multiple licenses again
- File:Alausi tourist train.jpg - PD
- File:Sitio arqueológico Santa Ana - La Florida.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
- Images have proper alt text and are relevant to the article.
- Hope my singular comment can be addressed^ Arconning (talk) 12:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the sronly|World Heritage Sites was misplaced, if that is what you are saying. I fixed it, please check. Tone 20:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Arconning (talk) 04:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the sronly|World Heritage Sites was misplaced, if that is what you are saying. I fixed it, please check. Tone 20:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man im josh
[edit]Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 10 sources match what they are being cited for
Good stuff as always Tone. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.