Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1990–99)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1990–99) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC) & Vivvt [reply]
Vivvt has been working on this list for a while, I did further expansion and cleanup. Looking forward to constructive feedback. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments from BeatlesLedTV
I think that's mainly it for me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Looks good to me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks BeatlesLedTV for the comments and support. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment by Force Radical
- Fix alt text in images
- Done
- Consistent ISBN's
- Done
- Satyameva Jayate should be in italics
- Done
- Explain in brackets what Sansad means
- Actually Sanad means 'certificate' or 'diploma', which is already mentioned in that sentence.
- Preferably use UK US NZ and J as hooks for the footnotes instead of A, B, C, D
- It doesn't look necessary to me.
That's all I have .Support — Force Radical ( Talk • Contribs ) 09:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments and support, Force Radical. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Courcelles (talk) 05:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"Recipients whose awards have been revoked or restored, both of which require the authority of the President, are archived" The recipients themselves are archived? Sentence needs work.
Courcelles (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Courcelles (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review
- Ministry of Home Affairs (India) could be wiki-linked.
- Same with Indian Navy and Supreme Court of India.
- You mentioned Indo-Asian News Service in ref. 15, but do not mention other agencies like Press Trust of India for ref 1. You might want to be consistent with the same.
- Also, why mention Mumbai here exclusively?
- You might want to wiki-link all the publishers on all their occurrences. I have been told that it's standard practice.
- Other that the minor comments, all the refs are functional. VedantTalk 18:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Numerounovedant All fixed. Thanks for your comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I've checked the sources again as it has been 3 weeks. They are all proper and functional. The source review is complete now. VedantTalk 14:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
That's all I have for a quick run. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
- PresN and Giants2008 It's been more than a month and this nomination has three supports, source review done, no unresolved issue. I think it should be promoted now. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- On the contrary, Numerounovedant has not confirmed that their source review is completed, and The Rambling Man has not confirmed that their review is concluded, which is why I didn't close it when I did a sweep this past week. --PresN 02:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 04:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.