Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ICC Champions Trophy centuries/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 09:59, 19 October 2014 [1].

List of ICC Champions Trophy centuries

Featured list candidates/List of ICC Champions Trophy centuries/archive1

Nominator(s): —Vensatry _(ping) 17:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A list modeled based on List of Cricket World Cup centuries, an existing FL. Look forward to your comments and suggestions. —Vensatry _(ping) 17:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments –

Add "the" before Cricket World Cup in the lead?
List of centuries: This section heading can be shortened to just "Centuries", with the understanding that it is a list because of the article's title. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:13, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed both. Thanks for the comments —Vensatry _(ping) 16:57, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments –

No need of "the sport of" since you've linked the cricket
- I disagree. There are people in some parts of the world who are not aware of cricket. —Vensatry _(ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, you're right, but they can open the article by clicking on link! Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - True! In that case we need not append the word "almanac" while mentioning Wisden right? I see no harm in having a clear explanation of what we're talking about. —Vensatry _(ping) 13:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - Ok, your choice! Khadar Khani (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"the second most significant after the Cricket World Cup.
- I'm not sure about what you're trying to say here. —Vensatry _(ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - You are claiming that this is the second after World Cup, so inline citation is required!? Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done —Vensatry _(ping) 13:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"during the first edition of the tournament.[7]" → during the first edition of the tournament in 1998. No need to link this again since this is linked in the first para. Also, this is pipe-linked to the 2000's edition!
- My bad. Fixed —Vensatry _(ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"As of 2013, five centuries were made in the finals with only two of them resulting in victories." Also needs citation
- We don't have a direct source for this claim. However, this is implicitly verifiable through the table. —Vensatry _(ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Don't you need "of" between "...two them..."? Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Good catch! Fixed —Vensatry _(ping) 13:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The list should be secondarily sorted by "Balls" column!
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Khadar Khani (talk) 06:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may add Template:ICC Champions Trophy at the end of the list. Khadar Khani (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Done and thanks! —Vensatry _(ping) 18:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support – meets the standards! --Khadar Khani (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Made some copyedits and did some rephrasing of the lead. I think you should cut the picture description to just "was the first player to score three centuries in the tournament's history" as it's confusing to include the record bit but other than that another good list. Cowlibob (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I've undone a few changes made by you in the lead. Agree with you on the picture's caption. Thanks for the support :) —Vensatry _(ping) 17:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, your edits were an improvement. If you've got some time, I have another accolades list up for review at FLC, Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Blue Jasmine/archive1. Cowlibob (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Avoid easter egg links, i.e. don't link individual years to tournament articles unless it's clear you're talking about the tournament, i.e. instead of "in 1998," you should have "in the 1998 tournament" and tweak the accompanying text to prevent repetition.
I've made a series of edits, mainly to avoid over linking or poor phrasing.
Make strike rates have same decimal places.
"Supersports park" is "SuperSport Park".

The Rambling Man (talk) 19:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done there I think. Thanks for the copy edits and comments! —Vensatry _(ping) 16:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. It is well-sourced and meets the FLC criteria. --Carioca (talk) 19:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.