Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Short Form Music Video/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 18:49, 18 June 2011 [1].
Grammy Award for Best Short Form Music Video (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Another Believer (Talk) 20:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets criteria and closely resemble other Grammy lists with FL status. Thanks, as always, to reviewers. Another Believer (Talk) 20:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Notes II and IV seem to be the wrong way round
- "Video producer(s) are only indicated if they were presented a Grammy Award" - shouldn't that say "director(s)" to match the column heading........?
- Hope this helps -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So embarrassing. (This list once had a Producer(s) column as well.) Corrected. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support no issues beyond the cornucopia of wisdom I have already imparted.... The Rambling Man (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all seems OK to me. There can't be more than, what, another 957 Grammy categories left to bring to FLC? ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Grammy Awards task force is working on that... :p --Another Believer (Talk) 20:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
"Awards recipients include the performers, directors, and producers associated with the winning videos." Not convinced that "Awards" should be plural here. It could be better starting with "Award", or failing that, "Recipients of awards".
- Right. Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 03:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Some of the 1984 and 1985 nominees don't have a song listed. What's up with that?
- I am not sure, and I cannot find an answer. What is presented, though, is what the source indicates... Honestly, I wish I could find more information about the nominees for those years. Will keep digging for more details... --Another Believer (Talk) 03:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All caps in the title of reference 24 should be removed.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Thanks so much! --Another Believer (Talk) 03:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – If you can't find the nominees' songs for those two years in reliable sources, then they shouldn't be included. It's unfortunate, but having content like that unsupported is a no-no for an FL. Everything else looks like it meets the standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, I did not include the song titles because I cannot find them in reliable sources. Thanks for the support vote! --Another Believer (Talk) 21:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – If you can't find the nominees' songs for those two years in reliable sources, then they shouldn't be included. It's unfortunate, but having content like that unsupported is a no-no for an FL. Everything else looks like it meets the standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.