Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Hard Rock Performance/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 21:48, 24 August 2010 [1].
Grammy Award for Best Hard Rock Performance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Another Believer (Talk) 22:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets FL criteria and closely resembles other Grammy-related featured lists I have successfully nominated (see profile). Here is one more! Thanks again to reviewers for taking the time to examine the list and offer suggestions! Another Believer (Talk) 22:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 06:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - "Metallica, which were expected to win...." reads extremely strangely to me. Over here in the UK, where band names are treated as plural nouns, we'd say "Metallica, who were expected....." In the States I believe the correct form is to regard band names as singular nouns, so I guess you'd say "Metallica, which was expected....." The current wording seems to me to be a hybrid of both and not correct in either version of the language...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In this case, I think "who were" sounds best. I corrected the lead. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:29, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support job done. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support can't see any other issues -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Courcelles 00:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments I'm going to scratch the barrel and nitpick, because I've cast one too many !votes lately.
Prose looks good, clean up the referencing and I'll gladly support. Courcelles 06:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Courcelles 00:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Only minor issue I see is a tense conflict between singular and plural: there's a "were" for Metallica and a "was" for Living Colour.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. I added "The band" in front of Living Colour, making the subject singular (so "was" is appropriate). Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 23:34, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support --Cheetah (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for taking the time to offer suggestions. Please let me know if there are any additional concerns that need to be addressed. --Another Believer (Talk) 06:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.