Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Dance Recording/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 16:42, 2 August 2010 [1].
Grammy Award for Best Dance Recording (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Another Believer (Talk) 17:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets FL criteria and closely resembles other Grammy-related featured lists I have successfully nominated (Best Alternative Music Album, Best Female Rock Vocal Performance, Best Male Rock Vocal Performance, Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album). I realize another Grammy-related list is currently being examined by reviewers, but many of the concerns have been addressed and the list has received support already, so I thought it was acceptable to nominate another list (and I have other lists waiting as well). Thanks again to reviewers for taking the time to examine the list and offer suggestions! --Another Believer (Talk) 17:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) Excellent stuff, just a few nitpicks:
2005 – according to the source, "Good Luck" features Lisa Kekaula; do you make distinctions like that on the list?
- I just say "and" as opposed to "featuring". If they had won, both would have received a Grammy award, so I think "and" is more inclusive. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2006 – according to the source, "Galvanize" featured Q-Tip, but you make no mention of that in the list.
- Done. Thank you for pointing this out--now sure how I missed that. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dabomb87 (talk) 15:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Wizardman Operation Big Bear 22:31, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comment: "In 2003, the Academy moved the category from the "Pop" field into a new "Dance" field." So was the award called best pop recording originally? Didn't sound like it but this sentence seems to imply that. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 22:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Quick comment – "Gloria Estefan holds the record for the most nominations without a win, with three nominations." The last word is a bit of redundancy that can safely be removed.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 02:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Resolved issues; meets WP:WIAFL.--Truco 503 03:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 21:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Comment: Do artists need to be linked multiple times in the same table? Example: Justin Timberlake twice right next to each other. Tezero (talk) 15:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It is necessary for sortable tables, because we can't always determine which Justin Timberlake table cell appears first. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just looked over the nom's other FLs, and apparently this is fine. Stands to reason, anyway. I think I will support this. Tezero (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It is necessary for sortable tables, because we can't always determine which Justin Timberlake table cell appears first. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.