Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Beyoncé Knowles discography/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 15:53, 16 April 2011 [1].
Beyoncé Knowles discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Beyoncé Knowles discography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Beyoncé Knowles discography/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because i am a great fan of Beyonce, i have been working a lot on her discography and i sincerely want it to be promoted to FL. I started with this and ended up with this. I will be very happy to fix any issues you will post. Thank you. Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral and moral support, because I'm involved in many ways with the subject and nominator, but I can comment. For some reason six discographies are listed now at FLC and I prefer to comment here about its issues, there are some of them: Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 05:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 06:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;General
|
- Thank you very much Tbhotch. Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You're mostly welcome. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 06:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much Tbhotch. Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "and two months later, it was confirmed that the album would be released in June of the same year.[23] " – remove unnecessary comma Done Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Album appearances: use [2] as ref for "So Amazing" Thank you very much for the reference Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Katrina CD is a soundtrack? For what film? Moved to album appearances Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 52, 53, 54 are not in the language you added. They are simply in english. Done Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 62 is not Dutch; its German. There is a big difference between the languages. Done Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strange titles, like ref 54 and 51. Fixed Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Will add more comments if I'll find any.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 11:37, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Im sorry but im going to oppose this article for now. (Not to all concerned i was asked to comment here, this is in noway a violation of canvas as ive talked to this user maybe once and ive never edited a Beyonce article before.) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:42, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia:LEAD#Length "As a general guideline, the lead should be no longer than four paragraphs." Current length is 6, it needs to be trimmed.
- Beyoncé_Knowles_discography#Live_albums i really dont know what to make of this, 10 cols should be the maximum, anyone reviewing have any suggestions because its current form, to put it bluntly its a mess (no offense intended).
- Beyoncé_Knowles_discography#Remix_albums US:14,000 ---> US: 14,000
- Beyoncé_Knowles_discography#Other_releases Notes need sources.
- WP:MOS#DATE Version: 2010-09-21 or Version: April 5, 2011, not both. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:42, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose The lead is needs a lot more to make it to FL status. The article is currently on its way, but is not there. As mentioned above, the lead compromises of too many short paragraphs. It is awkwardly structured as a summary detailing the overall success of her career should be placed last. For examples, see Madonna albums discography, Madonna singles discography, Mariah Carey albums discography, Mariah Carey singles discography, Taylor Swift discography. There is a lot of irrelevant information about Grammy Awards, which are better suited for List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé Knowles. First week sales of albums are not important. The lead should primarily discuss overall album sales and records. There is irrelevant information about the musical genres of I Am... Sasha Fierce. Not enough information is given about the album's success. The upcoming album is discussed too much, when there is not even a title or a single released. The countries for the peaks should remain the same and there should be ten at most. As to say, pick the ten most important charts and stick to them. Any other charts are left to to the album and singles pages. Some certifications don't have the countries the same as with the peaks. For example, in studio albums, the peaks has "AUS" for Australia, but the certification have "AU". Make them the same. There are also other minor issues with the lead and other sections. Bottom line the article is heavy need for a long peer review before it could be nominated again as there is too much to be done. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 22:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So do you all mean that i should go into details about the chart performance of the albums as well as their respective singles? Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Beyonce has only one discography page, compromising of both her albums and singles not like Madonna and Mariah Carey. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am re-writing the lead. When i first wrote the lead. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Beyonce has only one discography page, compromising of both her albums and singles not like Madonna and Mariah Carey. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am withdrawing. I thank everybody whose comments have been helpful. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.