Object, not ready for being a FA. Pictures lacks proper tags, and if you claim fair use on any of them you ought to provide a rationale for it. Try turning the list of facilities into normal prose. Also, I get left with a feeling that this article isn't complete - it says a bit about the history, a bit about where the school is, and thats about it, apart from the list of facilities. What makes the school special? Is there any school sports teams (which I understand there typicaly is on US schools)? As a private school, I'm assuming parents have to pay - but the article don't say, nor how much, nor what class of people attend? Overall, a good start, but I feel it's not ready quite yet. WegianWarrior06:40, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Compare with Caulfield Grammar School and Stuyvesant High School - a featured article and close-to FA respectively - and you will see this article doesn't have the depth and notability of the highest quality high school articles. See the Schools Wikiportal for some inspiration and advice for this article. Harro5 08:11, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
Object, I agree with all the points made above. Compare with Caulfield Grammar School and make sure you expand the History section. Also, are there any other references outside the school itself? - Mgm|(talk) 08:47, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
Trying to deal with very fair complaints, I had not seen the very nice Caulfield page. Thusfar I've added external links, copyright information, and I've started expanding the main information (before going into academic breakdowns)
