Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/October 2022

Guitar Songs[edit]

Guitar Songs is the second extended play (EP) by American singer-songwriter Billie Eilish. Released without prior warning to digital platforms on July 21, 2022, it consists of two ballads—"TV" and "The 30th". Both songs feature Eilish's soft vocals over a minimalist production consisting of an acoustic guitar. The two also have closely personal lyrics, a product of issues that Eilish had faced while writing them. Music critics praised Guitar Songs for its lyricism, and some considered this a testament to her songwriting talent.

Guitar Songs

3 articles

"TV"

"The 30th"

Contributor(s): Your Power

The articles for the EP and all two tracks are currently GA. Big thanks to User:VersaceSpace for the helpful review on the EP article, and big thanks to User:Kyle Peake for carrying the song articles' reviews. --‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍ ‍ ^{💬 "What did I tell you?"}
_{📝 "Don't get complacent..."} 00:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~~Comment~~ ~~the main article Guitar Songs uses "the EP" too much in the lead, especially the second para when the title is not even used once but otherwise,~~ fantastic job on these well-written, reliably sourced articles that I proudly reviewed two of! --K. Peake 07:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kyle Peake: I have trimmed the use of "EP" in the lead - let me know if this point has been addressed. ‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍ ‍ ^{💬 "What did I tell you?"}
  _{📝 "Don't get complacent..."} 07:26, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: ~~On "TV" MTV News is work, while on "The 30th" and the EP is publisher, be consistent.~~ MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Huh, could have sworn I made it |work in all cases... seems like someone ran a script to change it. Tweaked back to my preference, @MarioSoulTruthFan ‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍ ‍ ^{💬 "What did I tell you?"}
  _{📝 "Don't get complacent..."} 10:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is nitpick-y but I notice the redundant |language=en in some references. May I know how did you cite sources? Ippantekina (talk) 16:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ippantekina: the primary way I cite sources is by using the Visual Editor's citation maker - it's hard for me to format refs on Wikitext, so this was a more convenient way of doing it for me, blips aside... generating citations using that method automatically adds |language=en for English-language websites. I used to think they were useless, though another editor informed me that the parameter helps translating editors with recreating an article in another language - i.e. the reference will show up w/ something like "(in English)" in other language Wikipedias. I can put the parameter on all the other refs - or remove them altogether - for consistency, if you wish. ‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍ ‍ ^{💬 "What did I tell you?"}
  _{📝 "Don't get complacent..."} 00:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  I see. Thanks for clarifying! Support-- Ippantekina (talk) 04:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  
  How does that help other editors? The information it is still in English, seems redundant. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  In case some editors want to translate the articles to another-language Wikipedia it can prove helpful. I personally would remove the language parameters for English-language sources, but it's not a big obstacle for me to not support the nom. Ippantekina (talk) 02:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Same for me. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: The EP and both tracks, at GA quality, and no tours or live material to accompany. Looks complete! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: EP and related singles are GA quality. Great work! Pseud 14 (talk) 00:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This GT nom has been open for three weeks without any objections or additional comments. @WP:FTC coordinators: perhaps one of you lovely folks can close? Thanks, ‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍ ‍ ^{💬 "What did I tell you?"}
_{📝 "Don't get complacent..."} 15:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Guitar Songs}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 22:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 snooker season[edit]

The professional events played during the 2019–20 snooker season

Contributor(s): Lee Vilenski

All of the professional events that make up the season are here. There is also additional articles such as the main one, the rankings and X in cue sport lists (which can be removed if not suitable) Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC) --Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Just as a heads up, you have three dab links in the table: 2020 Championship League, 2020 European Masters and 2020 World Grand Prix. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 13:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Changed Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ According to 2019–20 snooker season the following events were also part of the season: 2019 World Seniors Championship, 2019 UK Seniors Championship, 2020 World Seniors Championship, but none is GA or better. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per comment above. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~, unfortunately, per above. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like 2020 World Seniors Championship is now a GA and can be added to the proposal, and 2019 World Seniors Championship is a GAN. I'm willing to hold off on closing this, since it seems to be actively undergoing work to complete the proposal. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quick update on these, the three items missing are all at GAN (and one has passed). Would you support Armbrust, MarioSoulTruthFan when these pass? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no problem. Just add them on the table once they become GA. Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that’s fine with me. Although I don’t think the in cue sports articles should be in this topic. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:34, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Please ping me when the set is complete. Like Armbrust, I think that the '(year) in cue sports' articles should be excluded. I also question the inclusion of the Seniors Championships - it might be better to rephrase the topic as something along the lines of "2019–20 World Snooker Tour season", and use WST calendars as the guide for what to include, at least for recent seasons. (e.g. this calendar doesn't mention the World Seniors.) Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was originally what the scope was - but the opposes made me add the seniors events in. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:56, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am finally there with this nom. I've removed the two "X in cue sports" articles per request, and the remaining articles are now GA or above. - could I get a confirmation of happyness? BennyOnTheLoose, Armbrust, MarioSoulTruthFan and Bryanrutherford0? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good job! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WP:FTC coordinators: - as this one's been open for a while (by my own fault admittedly), I think the general consensus is that I've now covered the topic with the additional articles - is there anything more I need to do? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Great work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing with consensus to promote. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

World Professional Match-play Championship (snooker)[edit]

The World Professional Match-play Championship was a professional snooker tournament established in 1952 as an alternative to the professional World Snooker Championship by some of the professional players, following a dispute with the sport's governing body. Fred Davis won the first five editions of the tournament, but didn't participate in 1957, when John Pulman won. After this, the event was discontinued due to a decline in the popularity of snooker. A tournament with the same name was staged in 1976. The events from 1952 to 1957 are now regarded as editions of the world snooker championships, but the 1976 one is not.

World Professional Match-play Championship

8 articles

1952 World Professional Match-play Championship

1953 World Professional Match-play Championship

1954 World Professional Match-play Championship

1955 World Professional Match-play Championship

1956 World Professional Match-play Championship

1957 World Professional Match-play Championship

1976 World Professional Match-play Championship

Contributor(s): User:BennyOnTheLoose, User:Lee Vilenski

The main article and all editions of World Professional Match-play Championship are Good Articles. --BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support: The scope makes sense, all are GAs, and there's a category and navbox. Looks right to me! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 23:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wasn't aware this competition was a thing, even as a snooker fan. Complete topic and no issues with the nom. NapHit (talk) 10:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@WP:FLC director and delegates: - apologies to ping on this one, but do we need anything further on this? Happy to wait, but I can't see any issues with the series of articles. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lee Vilenski: wrong ping, this is FTC, not FLC. --Pres N 19:53, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski: It's nice to get more than two replies, if possible, before saying that a consensus has been established. If you wanted to help tip the decision, you could always indicate your support for the candidacy... :) -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As a major contributor and nominator, I assumed it wouldn't be suitable, but, yes I absolutely support the nomination. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support this seems to fulfil the good topic criteria, no concerns. Z1720 (talk) 23:37, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lankyant (talk) 01:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{User:NovemBot/Promote}} -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a note Bryanrutherford0, I'm not sure anything was actually promoted. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, apologies! I'm talking with the maker of the promotion bot, and hopefully we'll get it figured out; if not, I'll just process the promotion manually later today. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    - Bot maintainer here. The ping (which is how the bot is summoned) didn't go through. Perhaps because this edit also touched a line above the promote template. Will try again. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/World Professional Match-play Championship (snooker)}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Like[edit]

Lady Like is the debut studio album by American singer-songwriter Ingrid Andress, released in March 2020. Three singles were released to promote the album, with "More Hearts Than Mine" reaching the top 30 on the US Billboard Hot 100.

Lady Like

4 articles

"Lady Like"

"More Hearts Than Mine"

"The Stranger"

Contributor(s): Sebbirrrr

All articles have been promoted to GA status. Sebbirrrr (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support: The album and all three singles, at GA quality, with no associated tour or live album, linked by the usual supercategory situation typical of album topics. Looks right to me! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 18:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I reviewed two articles of this GTN, hopefully, it won't be too biased.~~On "More Hearts Than Mine" wikilink Taste of Country.~~ MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Linked, thanks. Sebbirrrr (talk) 12:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - have to say I have never heard of Ingrid Andress, but this looks like a complete topic to me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Lady Like}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ON TV (TV network)[edit]

ON TV was an American subscription television (STV) service that operated from 1977 to 1985, mostly owned by Oak Industries. ON TV represented the equipment manufacturer's foray into the communications industry. Subscribers paid money to rent a decoder box and receive monthly service, which was broadcast in scrambled form over eight UHF television stations and featured movies (including softcore pornography for an extra charge), sports, concerts, and special events. While ON TV operated the most successful STV service in the United States, in Los Angeles, the business dwindled after 1982 due to the rise of cable television, signal piracy, and a poor economy, as well as several content disputes with individual stations over airtime and adult programming. The last ON TV operation, in Chicago, closed in 1985; the eight stations each reverted to commercial programming, three of them becoming Spanish-language stations.

9 articles

Contributor(s): Sammi Brie

This is my first ever GT nomination and the first GT in the field of broadcasting. I have been working toward this all year by improving each of the articles to GA status (ON TV was promoted last year). --Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ Support: That's a lot of good work! I'm a little concerned about FT/GT criterion 1c: "All articles or lists in the topic are linked together, preferably using a template, and share a common category or super-category." The main article barely has links to some of the stations; I think it would go a long way to even just have a "Further" hatnote at the start of each station's section. Likewise, there's no shared category that I can see, and no navbox template. I suppose you can just create the category connection; probably the ON TV history is important enough to each station to justify it. I think I can support it once this is addressed. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 01:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bryanrutherford0, I just created Category:ON TV (TV network) which should cover it. A navbox would be overkill, especially as these pages tend to have several of them and this is a comparatively low-affinity grouping. (Three of the eight and another two of the eight are each linked by a navbox by virtue of having a common owner now.) I also added {{further}} hatnotes in the main article. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:29, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good work! I can support it now. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bryanrutherford0: I wouldn't normally ask, but I'd like to have this promoted so I can count it with my WikiCup contributions (October 31 is the last day). Even if I might not be getting first, I'm proud of the fact that WikiCup led me to my first-ever GT, and I'd like to be able to claim it for points. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks like a suitable topic to me. All items are now GAs. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - meets the criteria IMO. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops messed up wrong place Danubeball (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Fits well enough. Danubeball (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/ON TV (TV network)}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 21:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]