User talk:Zxcv6666

Did you just seriously just spam edits in your sandbox to hit 500 edits so you become extended confirmed

Just wondering. Not sure if it's against the rules to spam edits in your sandbox to hit 500 edits so you become extended confirmed, and if it is allowed, you won't become extended confirmed until August 11th... 24.115.255.37 (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was testing my AutoHotKey script. You see that it is six edits every minute so it is a script. Zxcv6666 (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look like edit farm 125.26.95.198 (talk) 09:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think that scripts like that are allowed 24.115.255.37 (talk) 14:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this type of disruptive editing is not allowed. Please see the policy on gaming permissions. Also, have you ever edited Wikipedia before creating this account? Your fifth edit after creating your account was "clearing the sandbox" which is an odd thing for a new user to do. C F A 💬 00:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was testing if a non-autoconfirmed user can skip captcha Zxcv6666 (talk) 00:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So have you edited Wikipedia before creating this account? This seems very suspicious. C F A 💬 00:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bobbin Head, New South Wales, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. C F A 💬 02:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sandbox

why are you clearing the sandbox every few seconds? 49.182.134.204 (talk) 23:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just like clearing the sandbox Zxcv6666 (talk) 00:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to clear the sandbox. Hazard-Bot and Cyberbot I do it automatically. You are just wasting your time. C F A 💬 00:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It increases my edit count Zxcv6666 (talk) 00:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to increase your edit count? C F A 💬 00:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just telling a fact that it increases my edit count. My browser's homepage is the Wikipedia sandbox. Zxcv6666 (talk) 00:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but why do you feel the need to increase your edit count this way? You are not helping Wikipedia by clearing the sandbox. Bots already deal with that. C F A 💬 00:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bots only clean every hour Zxcv6666 (talk) 00:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sandbox does not need to be cleared more than once an hour. You haven't answered my question: Have you ever used any accounts on Wikipedia? C F A 💬 00:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't really matter because a person could be looking through the history and saw other editors clearing the sandbox and they want to do it. Zxcv6666 (talk) 00:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not what you did. You keep dodging the question. Please just tell me, yes or no, if you've ever used any other accounts. C F A 💬 00:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. TechnoWikis is a friend that I have invited to my house once who used my computer. Zxcv6666 (talk) 09:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That only counts as good if you're making Wikipedia better. Otherwise it's just spam. 49.182.134.204 (talk) 00:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eungai railway station

Care to explain why you removed the protection template from Eungai railway station just a few hours after the protection expired? Usually, a bot automatically takes care of this. Just shows further evidence that you are User:RichardHornsby. Fork99 (talk) 09:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fork99 I am NOT RichardHornsby. Zxcv6666 (talk) 20:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:RichardHornsby per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RichardHornsby. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 20:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zxcv6666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Technically I am not a sockpuppet. Zxcv6666 (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Technically this isn't an unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed sockpuppetry. One might even say... Technically indistinguishable. --Yamla (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]