User talk:Zuhdizuhdi

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Malaysia on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Neil916 (Talk) 15:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Drogba didier cfc profile 2006.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Drogba didier cfc profile 2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Muchness 14:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Didier Drogba 2007.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Didier Drogba 2007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Muchness 14:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Manchester United F.C.. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Struway (talk) 07:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Manchester United F.C., you will be blocked from editing.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Manchester United F.C., you will be blocked from editing. - PeeJay 18:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester United F.C.

I don't understand why you keep removing those statements from the article. The first statement is a qualifying statement of how good United's attacking threat was last season, and the second statement explains how the title was won. Those statements are not intended to be derogatory towards Chelsea, so I don't see what your problem with them is. Please reply. - PeeJay 15:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.png

Thanks for uploading File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 14:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to add a fair-use rationale. :) — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 16:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hunny Madu.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hunny Madu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 00:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Zuhdi.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Zuhdi.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK (talk ● evidence) 04:18, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.png

A tag has been placed on File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dave ¹¹⁸⁵ 01:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dave ¹¹⁸⁵ 15:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Clipboad01.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Clipboad01.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dave ¹¹⁸⁵ 15:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning, do not upload anymore screenshots or copyrighted images or you will find yourself taken to task for violation of Copyrighted material, which could result in you getting BLOCKED. Please heed this advice. Dave ¹¹⁸⁵ 16:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dave ¹¹⁸⁵ 08:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A note

This is not a template, but a message from a wikipedia administrator. Please explain yourself why do you keep uploading a copyrighted image. Repeating an action against basic wikipedia rules is considered as disruptive editing and shall lead to an immediate block of your account. Materialscientist (talk) 09:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another note

Zuhdizuhdi, you said you were Shahida's BF. Surely in that case you'd have your own picture of her, that you took yourself. This would not be copyright.

About your article at AFC: This is what needs to be improved for it to become encyclopedic:

On Wikipedia it doesn't matter what you know about the subject, we need proof. Links to websites for every bit of information you provide.
Also, not every person can have an article on Wikipedia. I wouldn't dream of making one about me, for example, or even of my principal. You need to show why she is notable enough to have an article about.
This last issue can be easily fixed. This is the English Wikipedia, articles need to be in good English.

~~My suggestion is that you go to the Malay Wikipedia to create this article, you may have better luck there.~~ Hang on... the article there looks familiar, you just translated it. Sorry, but what's acceptable over there may not be here- I'm sure Shahida is notable in Malaysia, but maybe not on a global scale. If she is, you need to show why.

Thanks for trying to help anyway.... Š¡nglî§h §Þëªk£r ^chat♫_contribs♪ 04:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shahida Azad Jamaludin was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 21:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shahida Azad Jamaludin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blurpeace 22:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sony PSP GO.jpg

The file File:Sony PSP GO.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, low-quality photo; better free alternatives exist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 04:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]