User talk:Zhiminy

This is Zhiminy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed E. Hassan (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zhiminy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Intro to Ahmed E. Hassan

Hello, Zhiminy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intro to Ahmed E. Hassan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan

Hello, Zhiminy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan

Hello, Zhiminy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ahmed E. Hassan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed E. Hassan (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 23:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed E. Hassan (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You actually removed sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed E. Hassan (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:SIRS. You do not have the sourcing needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed E. Hassan (November 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by UtherSRG was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please stop wasting our time.

UtherSRG (talk) 21:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I am wondering what types of materials are needed to be included in wikipedia since this character's PhD student - Foutse Khomh is also listed in wikipedia at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Foutse_Khomh. Thus, I think he might deserve a wikipedia page based on his contributions to software engineering in the last few decades, particularly he pioneered and recreated the domain of mining software repositories, as found in another wikipedia - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mining_software_repositories. Zhiminy (talk) 05:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly ignored the draft decline comments. You have wasted our time in doing so. Please move along to another topic. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the citations as required, which one is missing? Zhiminy (talk) 14:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to NACADEMICS criteria: IEEE and ACM fellow as qualifying. Zhiminy (talk) 14:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:SIRS and WP:BLP. You have many references that are not independent. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can either remove the asserted facts that are not supported by WP:SIRS, or you can replace those references with appropriate ones. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I have removed **Notable Research Areas at SAIL**, and for the rest, those sources are objective, is that sound enough? Zhiminy (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback, I have added two sources for IEEE and ACM award recipients respectively. Zhiminy (talk) 07:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ahmed E. Hassan. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 06:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback, I have added two sources for IEEE and ACM award recipients respectively. Zhiminy (talk) 07:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed E. Hassan has been accepted

Ahmed E. Hassan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 17:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Zhiminy (talk) 17:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zhiminy. Thank you for your work on Ahmed E. Hassan. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Definitely notable. However, the sources need proper formatting and the page might run into trouble if you do not do this quickly.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 17:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: Thanks for your reviewing. What specific text needs proper formatting? Zhiminy (talk) 17:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thr notable contributions should be proper refs. For instance use the WP cited, then remove the <ref> in front and behind.
The "**" for awards does not belong.
Ref 1 is incomplete -- who wrote it, date etc
Ref 3 is incorrectly structured
Ref 4 has not volume

etc Ldm1954 (talk) 17:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]