User talk:Zanesville320

This is Zanesville320's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

unsourced?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Zanesville320/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Zanesville320/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zanesville320! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Zanesville320/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Zanesville320/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Zanesville320/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Zanesville320/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:32, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Per your teahouse comment, see Help:Referencing for beginners. While you included some bare urls in your article, that is not how we handle sourcing and references here. Follow that bluelink for guidance. He iro 17:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: no independent sources, no indication that they pass WP:NCORP.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]