User talk:Zafarcreation/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Zafarcreation. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 9 |
Inappropriate removal of merge template
Hi there, this is not a constructive change. You shouldn't remove a merge proposal unless you have consensus to do so. The community will decide whether or not the article should be merged, not you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Need Help on Sandeep Anand (actor)
- Hi User:Zafar24, i am bhupesh and i need your help for an article Sandeep Anand (actor). There is a orphan tag on this article. If i remove this tag then first i need to link this article from any other wiki article. How can i do this? there are many articles available on wiki which have the name "Sandeep Anand" but that link is not working as real article name of Sandeep Anand is Sandeep Anand (actor). Hope you get my point.
BP (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
@Patel.bhupesh: Hi dear, your problem is solved. Here how to write: Sandeep Anand , please click this link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_I_come_in_Madam%3F#/editor/1 to see how it is done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zafar24 (talk • contribs)
- Zafar, please sign your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~) This will append your name and a timestamp at the end of your comment so that people will know who commented and when they commented. Just like this → Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Ok dear Zafar24 (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks User:Zafar24, Now i knew how to clean an orphan tag. Thanks for your contribution.
BP (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Please don't refactor other editors' comments
Your strikethrough in this edit is unwarranted. You shouldn't be refactoring other editors' comments. Please familiarize yourself with our talk page guidelines. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Ok dear, sorry for that. Zafar24 (talk) 23:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- List of computer hardwares
- added links pointing to Monitor, Ram, Flash drive and Printer
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Boldface
Please tone down the use of boldface in your talk page comments. This is needlessly distracting and needlessly draws more attention to your comments. You may use emphasis sparingly. Please see WP:SHOUT, which is part of our talk page guidelines. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks dear. Zafar24Talk 05:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
List of technology terms moved to draft to resolve disambiguation issues.
Greetings! Your Article, List of technology terms, has been moved to Draft:List of technology terms because it has too many links to disambiguation pages. Please resolve these disambiguation issues before requesting that the article be moved back to mainspace. Cheers! bd2412 T 00:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 7 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of softwares page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of computer hardwares
The article List of computer hardwares has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Wikipedia is not a list; the content of this article should be handled through wiki categories instead, or as additions to the relevant articles (e.g. computer).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. #!/bin/DokReggar -talk
06:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of computer hardwares. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Lame edit war
Hi there, you might consider dropping the stick on this. It's apparently irritating the other editor and you don't have consensus for the change. You can always seek a third opinion, but be sure to word it neutrally. Please read the instructions at WP:3O if you go that route. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:20, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Dear, @Cyphoidbomb:, You are doing partiality. You did not wrote anything on @Yashthepunisher: talk page . Zafar24Talk 05:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not required to be impartial. I'm offering an opinion. I've also offered you a tool that could wind up working in your favor. 3O is not binding, but it could help your argument. So, you're welcome. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Ok dear. Zafar24Talk 21:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)