User talk:Zafarcreation/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Zafarcreation. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Sources
Hi there, regarding these edits [1][2] telling another editor "Just read the Film Saaya Article in wiki" is not helpful. Because it is user-generated, anyone can add anything to Wikipedia, which means that it is inherently an unreliable source. Also, references should be included inline after the content they support. Telling people in an edit summary to watch a video doesn't make the article any stronger, because readers expect to find references at the bottom of the page, not to check the edit history and scour edit summaries for proof. The burden of proving something falls on the person who adds the content, which would be you. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tasker (app)
Hello Zafar24,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tasker (app) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 16:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
List of songs recorded by Shreya Ghoshal
I have merged the "religious songs" into the main article. As you removed the merge tags and thereby avoided anybody coming to your support to keep separate I thought this was the correct method to proceed. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Advantages of listening music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stress. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Help me
Can someone help me
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
to complete this page Draft:Poweramp
- You would be best to finish it but I seriously suggest adding any further available in-depth third-party news sources overall as it's still questionable for Wikipedia:Notability (software). SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Regarding the page List of songs recorded by Shreya Ghoshal
Hi Dear,
Please dont take my edits personally. But there is no need of the page or any section of the Religious songs sung by Shreya Ghoshal. The songs are already mentioned in their respective movies or albums. Please don't mind that as ultimately we both are aiming the same thing i.e. making wikipedia a site filled with correct information. I hope you will understand. Awaiting your reply.
Ayush Gupta At Wikipedia (talk) 13:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
@Ayush Gupta At Wikipedia: Dear, please tell me that if someone needs to know the name of religious songs by Shreya Ghoshal, then what will they do?
Copyright violations
Hi there. I've had to delete the two articles you've created, Advantages of playing Chess and Advantages of listening music because they are almost entirely comprised of copyrighted content. You cannot copy prose from other sites and drop them at Wikipedia. This is WP:PLAGIARISM. Frankly, I'm a little shocked that this isn't something you already know, since "do not copy" is such a basic concept. That said, consider this your official notice/warning that you may not do this again. Quotations can be included in articles in reasonable amounts. You cannot build an entire article, or even the majority of it on prose content lifted from other sources. All prose content is presumed to be copyrighted when published unless otherwise clearly specified. Wikipedia takes copyright violations seriously, and if you do this again, I will have no choice but to interrupt your editing privileges to protect the encyclopedia.
The entirety of Advantages of playing Chess appears to be lifted verbatim from mic.com, with a few extra references added by you. That is inexcusable. Same story with Advantages of listening music, which appears to be entirely copy/pasted from lifehack.org, collective-evolution.com and perhaps here. There's no excuse for this.
Further, even if you had written it yourself, the article sound like an opinion piece, not an article that's written from a neutral point of view, which all articles should adhere to. At best, these topics would be better presented as sections within articles on chess and music, but again, they would have to be bolstered with contrary opinions. Wikipedia is not a forum for people's beliefs or agendas, sourced or not. Content must be presented in a neutral tone. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Girlfriend (2004 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Re: See also section
Please take a thorough look at MOS:SEEALSO. It clearly states that the "See also" section should only contain "internal links to related Wikipedia articles. The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics." - Managerarc™ talk 14:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
@Managerarc: and @Cyphoidbomb: Sorry about that, I got it.
- Also please note that the "See also" section must be bulleted.- Managerarc™ talk 16:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.