User talk:ZFT

Welcome

Hello, ZFT, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Moonraker12 (talk) 10:23, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indian princely states

I noticed your questions at Talk:British Raj and Talk:Princely state but didn’t get round to answering them, though I see others have already done so.
On the point about Pudukkottai state, though, the map you mentioned does, in fact, show it as a native state. It’d be the area in yellow next to the "M" in "Madras Presidency" (south of what was then Trichinopoly).
I hope this, and the comments at Talk:British Raj have clarified the issue for you. Moonraker12 (talk) 10:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS: It isn’t really a good ides to delete comments from a talk page once they've been posted (see the talkpage guidelines on this); it’s better to strike them through with a comment if you need to (“not relevant now” or “changed my mind” or somesuch). Just a tip for the future! Happy editing! Moonraker12 (talk) 10:38, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Jschnur. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Fonuafo'ou, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jschnur (talk) 04:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pledge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rantoul, Illinois

Thanks dude. Nice work. Brycehughes (talk) 07:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Balaton

Hi ZFT, I was just answering you when I found that you had reverted your question. Here is my answer, just in case it's useful to you - delete it if you prefer.

Lake Balaton?

What about the Lake Balaton rift?ZFT (talk) 18:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not actually clear that Lake Balaton is a rift, although the Pannonian Basin as a whole is certainly a result of crustal extension, but I can't find anything definitive about the lake itself. The Pannonian Basin was not formed in a similar way to the ECRS, being a result of extensional collapse of the Carpathians aided by roll-back of the subducting slab [1]. Mikenorton (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Dennis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tropical Storm Arlene. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Efec 180.178.142.49 (talk) 16:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? ZFT (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crowned republic

Just because an editor adds text which is not supported by a reliable source to one article, that is no reason to propagate it through Wikipedia. To add information to Wikipedia which has been challenged the burden is on you to come up with a reliable source that supports the information. Also this is not something that needs to go in the lead, but needs first to be added to the body of the articles and then summarised in the lead. -- PBS (talk) 22:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The text was added to Stadtholder by Fastifex (see Revision as of 17:47, 26 February 2006). Fastifex is still active so you could enquire of Fastifex if there is a reliable source for the information. -- PBS (talk) 22:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santo Daime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazonian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Shannara artifacts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warlock Lord. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oligodynamic effect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beylik of Tunis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beylik. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZFT. You have new messages at Bermicourt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Magnetizing current

Please ask for deletion either.Xx236 (talk) 05:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ZFT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sideband

ZFT, I would suggest that you give up on the conversation at Talk:Sideband. I'm not sure that we can help you any further and the page is meant for discussing improvements to the article, not to help you understand. We have a science reference desk where knowledge questions can be asked. But really, you need to work through the mathematics before you will get a true understanding of what is going on. As I said in the previous conversation, it is much easier to see intuitively that the signal is composed of three frequency components by looking at it in the form of a phasor diagram. See this book page for that. Vector addition of the three components just results in a single vector changing in length (ie a single frequency changing in amplitude). SpinningSpark 13:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ZFT. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ThatPower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MLA

Regarding this, I've updated both articles to reflect that announcement. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:39, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy Joel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ZFT. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meta-ethics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cognitivism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Civitote (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article contains no information relating to the title.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Civitote and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Civitote, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 02:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZFT! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GeneralPoxter (talk) 02:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Krautrock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Can (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Block voting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tankless water heating, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Water heater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Novella

According to the cited source, a tad under 20,000 words is a novelettes, and tad over 50,000 is a short novel. In between the two is a novella. I think The Writer is much more specific than a general dictionary and it's a reliable source for this subject matter. Do you believe that source is not a credible source? Graywalls (talk) 01:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm William Harris. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Golden jackal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. William Harris (talk) 08:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lordship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barony.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lordship

Hi ZFT, per WP:INTDAB, intentional links to disambiguation pages should always go through an article title that contains '(disambiguation)', even if that is a redirect. This lets editors and readers know that the link is intentional and not a mistake that needs to be fixed. Leschnei (talk) 13:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, sorry for the revert on Political violence but there was no summary to your edit, therefore it was difficult to tell if it was constructive or not. Anyway, thank you for the clarification, I didn't know that there was an article about the Argentinian regime itself. GenoV84 (talk) 20:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea has an RfC

North Korea has an RfC for the government type infobox. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sagflaps (talk) 00:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia talk:No original research, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]