User talk:YvelinesFrance

Welcome

Hello YvelinesFrance, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

YvelinesFrance, good luck, and have fun. --Six words (talk) 17:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yve, regarding your edits to the 1943 race riots, If you want to see the authors of the article and film of the source you deleted simply click on the film details link in the article. Also, please provide sources for your opinion that the KKK in Detroit is "useless" to the background of the race riot. Regarding your "inflammatory" accusations, the racism, the KKK, and white supremacy are all real things. You cannot ban mentioning sourced material simply because you believe that mentioning it is offensive or not PC.Lance Friedman (talk) 12:57, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image discussion

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian American#Infobox ethnicity representatives. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IQ and the Wealth of Nations

Re your edit.

Per WP:BURDEN the person adding or restoring challenged content MUST provide a source. Period.

The rest of the paragraph, while not specifically footnoted is referenced to the actual content of the book itself. If you do not believe that the content in the article is an accurate summary of the book, then you may challenge it. -- The Red Pen of Doom 15:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The content in the article needs to be presented as content from the authors in the book and reflect ONLY what is in the book itself and not any current review implying "See the authors were right in their predictions" -- The Red Pen of Doom 16:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Noel Ignatiev. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 12:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Asian American, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see Talk:Asian American#Multiracial Asian Americans.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POVing

POVing is not even a word. I believe you want to say "POV pushing." That said, I had already opened a section on the talk page to discuss whether the content you desire is appropriate or desirable for the article in question. Please join me there, rather than revert warring and refusing to discuss the issue. KillerChihuahua^?!? 16:37, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gangnam District

This is regarding your edits at Gangnam District. Please join me at the article's talk page, rather than revert warring and refusing to discuss the issue. -A1candidate (talk) 17:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Gangnam District". Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 11:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Noel Ignatiev. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Asian American representative approval period (Now until 18 December)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian American#Representative approval. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vindicated

- diff

		The Resilient Barnstar
		for your cool and calm comments and stance at Murder of Shaima Alawadi- Youreallycan 05:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rob, she was reverted the very next edit. KillerChihuahua^?!? 05:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snarkiness

Thanks for expressing your opinion of the candidates during the selection process at Talk:Asian American. However, your snarky comments in reaction to others votes can be seen as boarding on violating WP:CIVIL. I kindly request/ask that you refrain from continued like statements.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodian American infobox representative run-off between Haing S. Ngor & Dith Pran

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian American#Cambodian American infobox representative run-off. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gangnam District. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. S. Rich (talk) 02:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Pitchfork 500 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Lee Perry, Kiss (song), Teardrop (song), Orange Juice and More Than This (song)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--John (talk) 22:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not cool dude

Don't say stuff like this please. Ya' gotta have love for the people.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 18:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was getting tired of the feminazis trying to pretend that life is all rosy for men and that they are all evil misogynists. Men have much harder lives in the modern world. Women get everything handed to them on a platter. YvelinesFrance (talk) 12:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Get it together, editors

It's clear from what I've seen on this talk page and the reasons that led me to this user's page in the first place that this user is not conductive to the sterile, NPOV Wikipedia that most Wikipedia editors aim for. It's funny how much you can get away with when you have a username. I once had my IP address blocked for a single edit to Sarah Jessica Parker's page in which I described her as having "equestrian" facial features. I was banned for arguing against the inclusion of an entire section devoted to sexual imagery on the page for the movie Alien. ("Because the guy who wrote the screenplay said so" beat out my argument, somehow.) But if I was to go around making edits that reflect my outdated and sexist ideologies, that'd be okay? 68.100.138.56 (talk) 03:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lol. But seriously, your saying that I have outdated and sexist ideologies is not NPOV. Modern feminism has evolved into a men's hate group rather than people striving for true equality. YvelinesFrance (talk) 12:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Chenogne massacre, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (Hohum ^@) 00:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:36, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, YvelinesFrance. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, YvelinesFrance. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, YvelinesFrance. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]