User talk:Yuezhi Huang

December 2024

Hello, I'm Ivebeenhacked. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Comac C919, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ivebeenhacked, thanks for the reminder, I’m now adding sources to each line of changes I’ve made in the past hours. Happy to invite you to check again in a few minutes! Yuezhi Huang (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. If you have any further questions to ask, please do so. Cheers. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yuezhi Huang. Hello there, it's me again (yay!). So today, I was scrutinizing the sources you added at the Comac 919 article and I noticed that you added a citation called "SimpleFlying". However, SimpleFlying's reliability has been discussed by editors multiple times at WP:RSN and it was deemed unreliable. I hope you understand and if you have further questions, feel free to ask me. Cheers! Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi there! Thanks for reaching out! I’ve corrected the source to an article on Shanghai Daily wrote by Xinhua, the Chinese state owned media. Hope this will work out! Merry Xmas and happy holidays!

Yuezhi Yuezhi Huang (talk) 02:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You too! Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 03:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siemens Viaggio Next Level (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siemens Viaggio Next Level and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Lemonaka 03:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yuezhi Huang! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Lemonaka 03:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]