User talk:Yuahrong

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Battle of Bakhmut, you may be blocked from editing. Super Ψ Dro 07:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Providing evidence and logic is not disrupting, stop trying to coerce people from sharing facts. Yuahrong Aiemryte 07:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop spamming the talk page. It is full of your comments. There is no evidence that 100% of Bakhmut is under russian control as of right now. End of the discussion. If I see you still spamming and sending wall texts I am going to report you at WP:ANI. Your actions are precisely against the Wikipedia policies WP:BLUDGEON and WP:WALLOFTEXT. When the city truly falls we're going to update it, trust me. Super Ψ Dro 07:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming my talk page. It is full of your comments. Zelensky admitted it already. End of discussion.

Also, providing evidence with a transcript is NOT spamming or wall text, report me and I'm going to report you and all your biased articles at WP:ANItoo.

My actions are not against any wiki policies, in fact theya re what wiki recommends.

The city has fallen, update it now. Yuahrong Aiemryte 08:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Account disclosure

Hello Yuahrong. You appear to be operating as a newly-created single-purpose account with existing and extensive Wikipedia experience. To avoid concerns of sockpuppetry in violation of Wikipedia policy, please disclose if you are operating other accounts and if so the reason for the creation of this new one. Otherwise, you may be subject to potential suspensions or bans.

Thanks! Yaksar (let's chat) 12:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]