Jump to content

User talk:Yourwikibuddy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Yourwikibuddy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bhagya sri113 (talk) 14:34, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Madison Clark, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are clearly editing in good faith and trying to improve the writing in various articles. Unfortunately, it doesn't really look like your command of English is strong enough to do that, so I think it would be more constructive for you to focus on other ways of improving the encyclopedia for now. Regards, bonadea contributions talk 11:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heads Up For Tails (July 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 09:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yourwikibuddy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 09:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bella Vita Organic (July 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bella Vita Organic has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bella Vita Organic. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bella Vita Organic (July 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntanO was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AntanO 17:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bella Vita Organic (July 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 06:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Information icon

Hello Yourwikibuddy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yourwikibuddy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yourwikibuddy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bella Vita Organic (July 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 16:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bella Vita Organic has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bella Vita Organic. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bella Vita Organic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- Possibly 17:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bella Vita Organic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- Possibly 14:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yourwikibuddy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was trying to create an article about the company Bella Vita Organic because i am a user of their products as well as my family members. I have used the products and got good results on my face and skin. I was checking out their page on wikipedia and when i did not found, i decided to write about it and found the articles on web and on the basis of that i have written the draft 2 times and both times it got deleted with saying advertising etc. I am not associated with this organization anyways neither i am getting any kind of money from them. I wrote on the basis of what i found on internet. Also i had edited to other pages as well. For example Forest essentials, that was accepted, why? I am new to wikipedia and don't have any intention to go against the rules and provide wrong information here. I request you to kindly unblock my account. Thank you. Yourwikibuddy (talk) 14:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per checkuser result reported below. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Forest Essentials was created by a Anthropologialist in March 2019. --- Possibly 14:58, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ Possibly : yes i know, i am not saying that i had created that page "Forest essentials", but I had made editing in the references which was accepted. If you or anyone thinks that i am associated with Bella Vita Organic then why would I be go and remove dead link to any one who is a direct competitor of bella vita organic. I am not even getting paid for anything here.

@331dot:  Likely !ɘM γɿɘυϘ⅃ϘƧ 17:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]