User talk:Yosefemet

Yosefemet, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Yosefemet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Bgwhite. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from YoungStartup Ventures. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Material is in reliable sources. We take the good and bad in account in writing articles. You also have a conflict of interest, as such, you should not be editing this article. Any further disruptions will result in a block. Bgwhite (talk) 20:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yosefemet, I suggest that you use the talk page to explain your arguments. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to YoungStartup Ventures. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yosefemet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have 1 and only 1 account and blocking me for Sock puppetry isn't appropriate, especially given there's nothing valid about it. the information listed in the edits I've made are credible Yosefemet (talk) 21:47, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.