User talk:YnysPrydein

White genocide conspiracy theory

Please stop adding information not supported by any sources. With other words; the part about the jews, feminism etc. Thank you. Olehal09 (talk) 02:00, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the source. -YnysPrydein (talk) 02:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that book is good enough. It has no peer reviews, they write about a very dubius term "white privilege", they write about white men as some conspiring maniacs without evidence, they include anti-feminism without any reason etc. The book is not satisfacory, no academics could write things such as this. Olehal09 (talk) 02:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both authors are established academics. Sage Publication is a well known publisher of academic journals and textbooks. It's a reliable source. -YnysPrydein (talk) 02:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But the publicers aren't educated on all subjects. Acording to the guidlines we need secondary sources and peer reviews, preferably academics from different fields, when we write about such subjects. Neither do the book claim all of these conspiracy theorists think about jews. In their book they went on and on about jews, without any reason. And neither did they have any evidence that people who only think about jews were represenative for the broader mass of theorists. Olehal09 (talk) 02:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I give Olehal09 a warning, I guess I should give you one to: WP:3RR. Please stop edit warring. Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

white genocide conspiracy theory

Please return to the discussion. You are also violating the original reserch rule. You also leave out the part about liberals. Olehal09. 194.248.100.142 (talk) 11:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New reply. Olehal09.2.150.82.60 (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read your sources. On David Duke they write that he belives liberals and Jews are behind it, they do also write about Neo-Nazis. I gave sources on Whitakers belives. I have given sources on the belives of Lane. What is your problem? From Olehal09 84.48.84.86 (talk) 14:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've not fabricated anything. You can read the source for yourself if you go to the talk page. I can not se that Whitaker particullary views Jews as instiagors. Olehal09 (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

State your reason for edit waring. You can at least argue, now you have proof of everything I've written. Olehal09 (talk) 11:03, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

STOP!

Take it to the talk page. I've asked for full protection. If you continue I'll ask for you both to be blocked. Doug Weller (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted to the wrong version? Nice work. -YnysPrydein (talk) 00:44, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

White genocide ...

Please reply to my arguments on the talk page, when you have the time. Olehal09 (talk) 02:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Join me on the talk page. Do you want us to just change the name of the article and subject. To something like: "Neo-nazis, white supremacist, fascist, genocidal and evil people's conspiracy theory, about how the aryan master race/white people as a whole are being victims of love, diversity and beauty through removal". I will certanly agree to this change, because this article seems to be centered around this consept now, thanks to you. Olehal09 (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Specifically, the section can be found at WP:ANI#Behavior of User:Olehal09 - T-ban request. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were also mentioned here. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]