User talk:Yemisky79
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fullomayo, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 19:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
I can assure that this is baseless accusation and this is my only account.
May 2021
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Isa Ali Pantami, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 17:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
I have a concern on why Wikipedia allow a previous edit to other users for a living person in such a manner that makes the entire biography largely about allegation and unproven statements. I have been following the edits on-going for a while and have observed an on-going edits that is just supporting character defamation in a very clever manner. My Edit was done professionally and I do not believe it violates any policy rather it presents the living persons biography about his real character and person. I will request and suggest that the newly added section of either controversies or allegations be removed to avoid further room for such baseless allegations and unproven statements from people whose interest is character defamation.
- Please point out an example of defamation. It has been weeks now and not a single account has pointed out the defamation. Watercheetah99 (talk) 02:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)