User talk:Yasal Shahid

Ways to improve Bihar University of Health Sciences

Hello, Yasal Shahid,

Thank you for creating Bihar University of Health Sciences.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

the page needs to be de-orphaned and expanded.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Wesoree}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 12:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wesoree I'm expanding it with information and It's name is mentioned in Universities in Bihar article. Yasal Shahid (talk) 13:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that's good, thanks! -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 13:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wesoree I completed from my side, pls check it once. And tell me if anything else needed in it. As per Government of Bihar, all medical colleges will be affiliated under this university only, registration in on the way. We will have to edit all those articles, in the affiliation section. Yasal Shahid (talk) 13:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also now that the page has been de-orphaned, we're fine. The stub template should be removed as soon as consensus is reached. -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 13:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wesoree Yes, i also created one Article for College, That's too old, so i can't got much information for that. Yasal Shahid (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this is perfect, but it's still considered stub or start-class. -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 13:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wesoree You understand more than me, add whatever you like. Thank You for supporting. I'll create more articles soon. Yasal Shahid (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no worries! -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 14:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COIN

Hello, just to make you aware I've moved your report from WP:EWN to WP:COIN, as it's the more appropriate location. You can find the new report here — Czello ^(music) 08:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to add these at EWN and Thanks for moving it to COIN. Many Thanks. As you know I'm a new user. So i need assistance of senior ones. Yasal Shahid (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The Ayurveda Company (T.A.C)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Ayurveda Company (T.A.C) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 26 § The Ayurveda Company (T.A.C) until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. S. Patil has been accepted

R. S. Patil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Syed amjad08 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GermanKity. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 16:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yasal Shahid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I voted on many Articles also added some articles for deletion but this doesn't make sense in blocking me with accounts which are also engaged in 'Keep' in an Article Discussion. I don't know who Syed amjad08 is there, i check they were doing political articles, but i have my main interest in Business and Education how can you get me connected to them? I request you to reconsider your decision. I'm here to contribute to Wikipedia, if you all want i should not contribute to Wikipedia then pls unblock me I'll not edit any article after that. Don't block with a fake evidence even my edit patterns doesn't match with anyone of them. Wikipedia doesn't support new users, i understand. Thanks & Be free. I was here working for free with an interest only but i think people who shown me as sockpuppet are of team against New users. Bye Yasal Shahid (talk) 17:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Denying that you did anything wrong does not constitute a valid appeal. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yasal Shahid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not harming Wikipedia in any terms. And i harmed any rules of Wikipedia then please forgive me, no such thing will happen in future. Thanks Yasal Shahid (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Saying that you did nothing wrong but if you did, you're sorry, is not a valid appeal. Please speak specifically about the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yasal Shahid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm blocked for just participate in a AfD. I'm not connected to them, I'm not doing any Partnership on Wikipedia. Please unblock me i want to contribute here. Thanks Yasal Shahid (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Three requests, three denials of wrong doing. Three strikes and you are out. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2023

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]