User talk:Yagasi
Welcome!
|
Hi User:Yagasi, welcome to Wikipedia. I can see that your edits to Wikipedia have mainly been related to the Comprehensive agreement on Iranian nuclear program. That's great but please remember to always keep WP:NPOV (a neutral point of view) and not to advocate for anything especially if you are personally involved with a topic. Also, Wikipedians should not have Wikipedia:Single-purpose accounts. Thank you for your edits.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Monopoly31121993, thank you for your remarks. I would like to ensure you that my contribution to Wikipedia included many topics and it has nothing to do with personal involvement. As an editor of Wikipedia I respect the goal of Wikipedia and its policies and guidelines, including WP:NPOV. Yagasi (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
talk discussion
[edit]One problem with the JCPOA article is that people don't use talk enough. In hopes of changing that, I'm notifying several frequent posters of the discussion re the lead here: Talk:Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action#Lead. Iran nuclear weapons 2 (talk) 11:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Your initiative is welcomed. Yagasi (talk) 12:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Dispute resolution regarding the Iran nuclear deal and threats against Israel
[edit]Please see my application for assistance at the Dispute Resolution noticeboard. Regards, Dontmakemetypepasswordagain (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. Yagasi (talk) 07:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
[edit]The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 5 May 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 19:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
[edit]The request for formal mediation concerning Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 05:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Yagasi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your editing of article about Michael Zinigrad
[edit]Hello,
You have been editing the article about Michael Zinigrad. Recently you erased the warning that was written by Chemist123 about Zinigrad's record. In your justification for erasing the warning you wrote that "The info about over 200 articles is based on 2 RS; h-index has a lot of limitations, contradicts the Universities assessment, and is misleading; look at Zinigrad's credentials on the AU site or on Google Scholar Profil)"
I could not find any profile for Zinigrad in the Google scholar. Please provide a link to Zinigrad's Google Scholar profile. Secondly please note what is 2 RS. Thirdly, please state what is your connection to Zinigrad and in what capacity you are editing the article on him. Until you do these, I am going to reactivate the warning that was posted by Chemist123. Chen35 (talk) 06:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have answered you here. Yagasi (talk) 09:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Yagasi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Yagasi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Zinigrad for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Zinigrad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Zinigrad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)