User talk:Worldofentertainment

Worldofentertainment, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Worldofentertainment! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William John Kennedy (photographer) has been accepted

William John Kennedy (photographer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerard Germain (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerard Germain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gerard Germain, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quintessa Swindell has been accepted

Quintessa Swindell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 21:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yves Rathle (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kohlrabi Pickle was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yves Rathle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yves Rathle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 04:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michele Northup

The article Michele Northup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 16:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: StarzPlay by Cinepax has been accepted

StarzPlay by Cinepax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 16:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chaz M Grooms

The article Chaz M Grooms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 19:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Michele Northup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michele Northup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Northup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

... discospinster _talk 19:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello Worldofentertainment. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Worldofentertainment. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Worldofentertainment|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ... discospinster _talk 19:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi discospinster, sorry I'm still getting the hang of Wikipedia so you will have to excuse my typing. However, yes, you are right, I did get paid for the two articles Michele Northup and Chaz M Grooms so I'll declare it on my user page and also on the talk pages of these pages. I do have a question though, if you can answer though, there were some pages that I was not paid for, can I create such pages directly or do I have to declare paid editing or edit in drafts, those pages as well. Thank you.

If you are not paid for creating an article then you don't have to declare anything. ... discospinster _talk 16:59, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Chaz M Grooms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaz M Grooms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaz M Grooms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

... discospinster _talk 23:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 14:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worldofentertainment (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I take full responsibility for my actions.I'm not sure what covert advertising is, but I was paid for two articles namely Michele Northup and Chaz M Grooms. I was not aware it was against Wikipedia's guidelines. In one of the messages above to a user discospinster, I clearly mentioned that I was paid however I was unaware this goes against Wikipedia's rules. If I can get a chance to get ublocked, I'll resume operations and clearly mention it on my talk page. Also I did not edit any further and still haven't after receiving that message from discospinster Worldofentertainment (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi - what do you plan to edit / contribute if unblocked? Also, can you clarify what you mean by "I'll resume operations"? Chetsford (talk) 20:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

I plan to edit/contribute random articles. I'll mention on the talk page and use the appropriate measures necessary for paid articles. By resuming operations, I simply meant continue writing on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldofentertainment (talk • contribs)

Can you give an example of a few articles you currently plan to contribute or edit? Can you describe the specific measures you'll take on articles for which you've been paid? Chetsford (talk) 04:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Well as an example, mostly pages related to actors, films and television shows like I did edits to Tanya Chisholm, Aja Naomi King. You can check the edit history in that case too, I was just adding missing information (I was not paid for it). For the paid articles currently, I do not plan to take any action however in the near future, I'll submit through AFC and mention on the talk page that I have been paid as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldofentertainment (talk • contribs)

An ability to sign Talk page posts is a basic demonstration of one's potential to productively edit WP. Therefore, I think I'm going to hold off on lifting the block until you've completed the WP:ADVENTURE and can demonstrate you can sign Talk page posts. Any other admin should feel free to accept or decline the unblock request in the interim. Chetsford (talk) 05:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Alright, thank you (Worldofentertainment (talk) 04:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC))

Worldofentertainment, Please disclose your connection with user Kolapoimam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). GSS ^💬 17:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

I honestly don't know who that is. (Worldofentertainment (talk) 04:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC))

There is evidence off-wiki that establish a connection between you and Worldofentertainment and, I'm open to sharing those details with an admin privately. GSS ^💬 04:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Sure, you may do so. (Worldofentertainment (talk) 05:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC))

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Worldofentertainment, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

FalconK (talk) 23:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gerard Germain

Hello, Worldofentertainment. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gerard Germain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Yves Rathle

Hello, Worldofentertainment. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yves Rathle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gerard Germain

Hello, Worldofentertainment. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gerard Germain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yves Rathle

Hello, Worldofentertainment. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yves Rathle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of StarzPlay by Cinepax for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article StarzPlay by Cinepax is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarzPlay by Cinepax until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)