Jump to content

User talk:Woggie10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, Woggie10, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miles Reid (rugby union), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Luke James (rugby union) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Luke James (rugby union), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 22:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke James (rugby union) has been accepted

[edit]
Luke James (rugby union), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Listing international tries

[edit]

Hi mate, just seen you add these lists to a few players. There was a brief discussion on this about 2 years ago on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby union page archived here. I think this is a reasonable one for discussion again on the talk page, so just wanted to highlight it to you before you do loads in case it gets deleted citing that discussion.Skeene88 (talk) 10:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wasps RFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Tunney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Section Paloise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aviron Bayonnais, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Callum Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yorkshire Carnegie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Elliott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Garside moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Karl Garside, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Bean moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Lewis Bean, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Archie White (rugby union) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Archie White (rugby union), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cadan Murley

[edit]

Hello, Woggie10,

Thank you for creating Cadan Murley.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 14:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lapérouse-class survey ship moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Lapérouse-class survey ship, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lewis Bean has been accepted

[edit]
Lewis Bean, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Garside has been accepted

[edit]
Karl Garside, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lapérouse-class survey ship concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lapérouse-class survey ship, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ruaridh Jackson

[edit]

Hi there @Woggie10: hope you are well? I just wanted to explain this revert I recently made to your edit on List of 2020–21 Pro14 transfers. When I read the source you provided with your edit, it seemed to me that Jackson has announced his retirement with immediate effect, as he appears to be speaking about his retirement in the past tense, indicating that is has already happened. That would mean his retirement took place during the current 2019–20 season, and should be noted on the 2019–20 page, rather than on the 2020–21 page, bearing in mind that the 2019–20 could still resume as it hasn't been declared officially as cancelled. What do you think? Happy to discuss further, or perhaps there is another source that proves that Jackson is retiring at the end of the 2019–20 season, and therefore should be on the 2020–21 page. Kind regards, MunsterFan2011 (talk) 14:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MunsterFan2011. I've never used talk before so no idea if you will see this is or not but i disagree with your reverting for two reasons. Firstly this article states that he will be retiring at the end of hte current season (https://www.rugbypass.com/news/co-captain-callum-gibbins-the-latest-to-leave-glasgow/) and secondly due to the coof and the exected extention of the season, literally everyone would be retiring/swapping clubs/be release during the "current season" meaning literally the current season transfer pages would be empty. Spirit of the decisions to changes clubs etc is to do so at the end of the current season not mid season. Therefore i suggest a simple NB should be put at the top of each page for the current season which notes that they may be playing for a different club in the same season but would effectively be for the following season Woggie10 (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Woggie10: thanks for getting back to me. As you say, that source from rugbypass clearly shows that Jackson is retiring at the end of the season, rather than immediately, so I have restored the edit to the page and added this source too, thank you. You make a very good point about the current situation regarding contracts and the potential resumption of the 2019–20 season after departing players' contract end on 30 June; perhaps it would be a good idea for you bring this up on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby union, as I'd imagine there's a few contributors on here who will have an opinion on the matter. I'll leave that up to you. Again, thanks for your input. All the best, MunsterFan2011 (talk) 14:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2020–21 RFU Championship transfers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Preece (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lapérouse-class survey ship

[edit]

Hello, Woggie10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lapérouse-class survey ship".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leicester Tigers

[edit]

Do you have a WP:reliable source that the players you removed are the ones that did not sign new contracts. Have you a [[WP:reliable source that showa they have left the club? Rather than edit on press speculation, can you replace them until such time that proof comes to light. noq (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Premiership Rugby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Hanson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of England national under-20 rugby union squads for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article England national under-20 rugby union squads, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/England national under-20 rugby union squads until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Many thanks, Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raffi Quirke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorlton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:England international rugby union records

[edit]

Template:England international rugby union records has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 458, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 21:57, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should look at the sources rather than just deleting stuff you don't understand and asking questions later. The source was already provided i simply correct the original persons edit because they made a stupid mistake by not properly updating the data. If you have a problem with referencing take it up with the guy who made the original edit. Next time understand what the issues is because doing stuff like that makes people less inclined to edit Woggie10 (talk) 19:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have had a look. I can’t see anything obvious that sources your edit. And if I, an experienced editor, can’t find it then how do you expect a regular reader to find the source. If the source already exists, then reuse it to source the edit you’re making. Danners430 (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The source has already been provided. The previous edit with the source has already been accepted. The formatting of sources has already been accepted. The standard of formatting is accepted across many many many articles of the same type. My "edit" is not an edit it is a correction Woggie10 (talk) 03:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you aware how to reuse existing sources? Because that’s what I’m suggesting. Oh and by the way, “corrections” are still edits and require sourcing. Danners430 (talk) 08:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Woggie10&oldid=1264076836"