User talk:WindowColorCenter

Talk if more sources exist

Looking for more sources for Minwax and Abatron that are not promotional or seem promotional. I'm surprised. WindowColorCenter (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By that I mean all references either lead to their website(s) and if not their websites all the information on the brands and their products would look like advertisements if cited. They are well established enough in the restorative construction industry so I am surprised there are at least no news headlines. WindowColorCenter (talk) 03:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for more references of history for Corveta Ipiranga V-17

Courtesy link: Draft:Corveta Ipiranga V17

(Brazilian shipwreck). Most are from the same source. WindowColorCenter (talk) 02:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft is submitted for review, which could take days to months. While waiting, or after declined if declined, or after accepted if accepted, you can continue to work on it. David notMD (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @David notMD. Thhank you so much. I am finding a lot of ways to contribute. I will continue working on this article and I'd like to make more as well as offshoots of other pages recommended to me. These links will be of great help present and future. Appreciate it WindowColorCenter (talk) 00:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added courtesy link. Try some of these sources:

mostly English: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
mostly Portuguese: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mathglot (talk) 18:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Board Crazy (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Board Crazy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WindowColorCenter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong thank you very much for the feedback. I was a little hesitant that the Wikipedia page might be declined for lack of a citations. I have learned to do research for articles before going to make the pages. I found out there wasn't enough half way going into the article. I think that to still bring it into conception in some way I'd like to make a different page concerning the topic but one with much more notoriety that still can mention the VHS in some way. Again thank you and I'll keep trying this out. WindowColorCenter (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greg James (publisher) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Greg James (publisher). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 00:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corveta Ipiranga V17 has been accepted

Corveta Ipiranga V17, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 16:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from pt:Cv Ipiranga (V-17) to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]