User talk:Wim van den Heuvel

This is Wim van den Heuvel's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks any references or sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wim van den Heuvel/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Wim van den Heuvel/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wim van den Heuvel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick and clear respons. We are looking for support to put a journal, i.e. "Romanian Journal of Family Medicine" (mainly in Romanian language published) on Wikipedia as well as some background data of the Editorial team of the journal. Also, we want to publish an overview of our activities over time.

We had former our own website: http://www.wimmarinela.com/

Maybe you have suggestions/proposals how to reach our objectives? Wim van den Heuvel (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Timtrent was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not the place to lodge your Curriculum Vitae.

If you are a real; academic you will also understands the presentation of work. Treat yourself to paragraph breaks. Submitting this was an insult.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wim van den Heuvel/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Wim van den Heuvel/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Wim van den Heuvel/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Wim van den Heuvel/sandbox. Thanks! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Wim van den Heuvel/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Wim van den Heuvel/sandbox. Thanks! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]