Jump to content

User talk:WilliamH/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12

Request

Hello, please give me the access of Confirmed rights, i tried WP Requests for Confirmed Rights but i didn't get any respon

Reason: I wanted to edit the page "Imam Ali A.S" but it asked you must be (Auto)confirmed and also give me the rights of Filemover cause there are some files which i want to move.e.g File:Pyaar Ka Dard Hain.jpg to Pyaar Ka Dard Hai Meetha Meetha Pyaara Pyaara.jpg please give me I've already tried on request page but i didn't get any respond & if you ask about Filemover request to request on the Filemover but i've already tried with my other accounts but i've received any respond (with my different IP addresses). so please please please give me the right of Filemover and Confirmed ToMaS786 (talk) 15:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

If you are unable to verify the sources which you intend to use, there is no incentive to grant you the permission. WilliamH (talk) 15:50, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Sock blocked. WilliamH (talk) 16:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
He's still editing. Please block the sock himself. David1217 What I've done 16:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Yup, done.

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hahc21

He withdrew. Please close this. Thanks, Electriccatfish2 (talk) 17:50, 8 July 2012 (UTC).

 Done, thanks. WilliamH (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tobias Conradi

You had asked for more evidence on the SPI (I wasn't the filer), and I'd provided some when I was about to block the account -- which I didn't do as it was active at SPI. Can you take a relook please? —SpacemanSpiff 13:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

Account creation interface!

I understand you're an account creation interface administrator. Do you believe I can be trusted with access to the tool?—cyberpower ChatOnline 12:35, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Am I? I haven't used the ACC interface for years, so I couldn't comment, sorry. WilliamH (talk) 17:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I was told that you are by the other interface administrators. They told me to consult you because they are hesitant to say yes to granting me access because of my block where I oversighted. They believe that because I was disclosing information that needed to be oversighted that I am unfit to handle private information. I and they want your input.—cyberpower ChatOffline 17:29, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, WilliamH I thought I would point you to this disccussion and yes you are still an ACC admin. Mlpearc (powwow) 18:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
William, sorry for the confusion. Being the blocking admin and an ACC admin it seemed so convenient to have you weigh in. Given your surprise i took a look. AGK reactivated your account at ACC about 2 months ago and a month ago promoted you to admin. My guess would be it having something to do with you also having CU rights here and CU access at ACC. We aren't supposed to be just randomly reactiving accounts so maybe AGK spoke to you and you forgot about it. ;)   delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 20:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I recall I might have tried to access ACC again, but didn't have any success due to my account having been inactive for a long while. Perhaps AGK saw this, reactivated my account, and made me an admin on it because of my other permissions. I'm off now, this is just to say that I'm aware of the discussion and will post a response tomorrow. In the mean time, Cyberpower could also consider contacting the other functionaries who reviewed the context of the block and the eventual unblocking. WilliamH (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Have you come to a conclusion yet?—cyberpower ChatOnline 21:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

edit

OK. Was about to but someone beat me to it. Soupy sautoy (talk) 19:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Lewi6400youtubeChannel (talk · contribs)

Hi William, you unblocked User:Lewi6400youtubeChannel on 24 January 2012 to allow for a change of username. However their username has not been changed, obviously I'm not aware of any other circumstances, but I thought I would left you know anyway. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, WilliamH. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is ACC request requiring your attention.
Message added 05:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—JmaJeremy•Ƭalk•Cont 05:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Light current CU

Did you offer any opinion on whether DriveByWire or Bred Ivy were related to Light current? I saw that you said that DBW and BI are unrelated to each other, but if you said either "one is LC and one isn't" or "neither of them are LC", I completely overlooked it. Nyttend (talk) 23:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

All the data for Light current is extremely  Stale, so any connection would have to be drawn on a behavioural basis. WilliamH (talk) 23:19, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Okay, didn't realise that at all. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 23:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

User:Bluesman3145

Hi. You blocked this user today as a sock of User:MooshiePorkFace, was this a checkuser thing? They've appealed via UTRS. Thanks Secretlondon (talk) 22:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

If you have UTRS access it is #2645 - presuming this is connected to paid editing. Secretlondon (talk) 22:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, have replied to it. WilliamH (talk) 15:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

re: Milo Yiannopoulos

Hello, WilliamH. You have new messages at PFHLai's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Template:Did you know nominations/Syque Caesar

The concerns in your review of this Olympics-based DYK have been addressed, if you want to recheck it. If not, let me know and I'll put the "recheck" arrow on it. Thanks! PS: No need to put a talkback on my page; I'll see this in my watchlist. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Milo Yiannopoulos

Orlady (talk) 08:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Milo Yiannopoulos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milo Yiannopoulos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milo Yiannopoulos (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FunkyCanute (talk) 09:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

Talkback

Hello, WilliamH. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 00:35, 28 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 00:35, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

Have you looked at

the other edits of DonaldBlack (talk · contribs)? Looks like the sort of edits I'd expect from his namesake - in fact, we may have a username problem here given his racist edits (we have Don Black (white nationalist) although that title underestimates Black's racism). Dougweller (talk) 18:47, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps worth keeping an eye on, but only three edits very justifiably revertable - I wouldn't say there's much to worry about at the moment. WilliamH (talk) 20:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
I agree - if he carries on like this he's not going to go far. I'm still thinking that there may be a username problem. Dougweller (talk) 20:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Smiles for you!

TheGeneralUser (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:User:Cowman109/Smile2}} or {{subst:User:Cowman109/Smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Just came around to say Hi :). Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, and likewise! WilliamH (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

My RfA

Hey William, would you mind making the closure of my RfA official? I withdrew it and added the "unsuccessful" RfA templates to the page myself, but I'm pretty sure I need a bureaucrat to do the honours as a formality. Thanks, and take care. =) Master&Expert (Talk) 22:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Looks all fine to me, nothing else to do. If you want to withdraw it, that's fine, it's your RFA. Good luck for a possible future one. WilliamH (talk) 22:14, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, Will. =) Master&Expert (Talk) 22:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Request an Account

Hi WilliamH, when you have time, there is a request (https://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=79462) at Request an Account which Elockid suggested you might be able to shed some light on. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 17:28, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks - I can't log in though, for reasons that aren't clear. Is my username WilliamH? I've tried all the passwords I use and none of them work, and it says my e-mail address is invalid when trying to reset the password - perhaps I didn't include one. Could you point an ACC admin in the direction of this? Thanks! WilliamH (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Yep WilliamH. Will do. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 17:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

SimonKnowsAll SPI

I've got a couple more accounts that might be worth including - should I add them to the SPI? Or are the likely to show up during the process? - Bilby (talk) 14:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

First ever Reading Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the first ever Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at Copa, 76-78 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3BJ on Sunday 23 September 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

No can do, not in the United Kingdom at that time. WilliamH (talk) 22:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Thought that you said something like that but didn't want to leave you out. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Haha, cheers! WilliamH (talk) 23:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Rob Ford

Hello WilliamH. I've just noticed a request for the Rob Ford article to be unprotected, and it seemed like a reasonable request to me, so I'm forwarding it on to you as the protecting admin. Maybe things have died down enough to change it to semi-protection? In any case, you can see the request at Talk:Rob Ford#Addition of current event to "Controversies" section, please. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 08:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

Petite Meller

This article have been recreated by user:Asaf Tom Mann could be sock of user:Gal deren d?--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 18:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Four  Likely socks blocked, G5d a couple of pages. Cheers. WilliamH (talk) 18:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
The article was recreated I think it should be salted.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 16:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 Done WilliamH (talk) 17:00, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, WilliamH. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 15:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

You have mail!

Hello, WilliamH. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 07:04, 28 August 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 07:07, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, WilliamH. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

-- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 16:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

Mailcall

You've got mail! WormTT(talk) 07:39, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, WilliamH. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Viriditas (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Trueman 31 SPI

Hello!

Just to let you know I've added plenty of diffs and other info to Trueman 31's SPI. Let me know if you need further info :)--5 albert square (talk) 21:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, WilliamH. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 13:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ankh.Morpork 13:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination to RfA

Good morning William - I noticed you are willing to nominate a user for Adminship. I'd like you to consider me for the position. If you have the time and will, let me know and I will post a brief resume and grounds for my nomination. If you feel I am not ready, please point out my weaknesses so that I can work on them. Greetings from Como, Italy :-). --Itemirus (talk) 07:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm willing, but unfortunately my time does not permit it. I recommend that you have a word with Dennis Brown (talk · contribs) - he's on that list, and from my experience working with him at WP:SPI, he's always been an excellent "go to" person. WilliamH (talk) 13:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you - I will contact him asap.--Itemirus (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kurmaa

Thank you for your action on the topic. I have placed now placed your confirmation at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Kurmaa. Chaipau (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2) Your review is required and will be greatly appreciated :)

Hi WilliamH ! I have started my second editor review at Wikipedia:Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2). I will be greatly delighted, thankful and valued to have your review for me regarding my editing and possible candidate for Adminship. I see you also evaluate possible candidates for Adminship as you had chosen to do so on Wikipedia:Request an RfA nomination, so do evaluate me too! As you are a experienced and long term Wikipedian so i have asked for your kind review. Take your time to review my editing and give the best review that you can :). Feel free to ask me any questions you would like to on the review page itself. It will be a great honor to have you review me for which I will truly feel appreciated and helpful! I always work to improve Wikipedia and make it a more better place to be for Everyone :). Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

UTRS Ticket 2645

Good afternoon. This ticket was reserved by you in UTRS and hasn't been received attention in 31 days. Could you please take a look?--v/r - TP 21:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Certainly, I shall take a look right now. It has been waiting on a response from the other side, but yeah, it doesn't look like that's coming, and I suspect that the answer they give would endorse the block anyway. WilliamH (talk) 21:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 Done. WilliamH (talk) 22:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!--v/r - TP 00:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

TutterMouse

This user appears to be caught in a rangeblock which you placed (although he has incorrectly applied for auto-unblock ). He has been here since 2008, with no apparent problem except for a couple of autoblocks for which he appears blameles. Would you see a problem in granting him IP exemption?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Someone got there before I did, but yep, IPBE granted fair and square. WilliamH (talk) 18:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

ip block lift

Hello, WilliamH. You have new messages at Ip:83.101.5.49's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

the ip 82.101.5.49 is inside a block that is statically assigned to people, it doesn't change, so it makes sense to remove the block and just block that single user that actually did vandalism...

  • It does make sense to do that, however it is not possible. The individual concerned uses many IP addresses, and blocking lots of them is the only way to deal with his disruption. Follow the instructions on your talk page - specifically the To edit, please log in box - and you will be able to edit with an account. WilliamH (talk) 21:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

Mail call

I've dropped you an email - hopefully you'll be able to help me out. WormTT(talk) 09:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

checkY Dealt with. WilliamH (talk) 11:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Indeed, thank you. WormTT(talk) 11:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination

If at any time you or feel that I am ready for adminship, would you consider nominating me for it? It would really mean a lot.—cyberpower ChatOffline 19:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

checkY Responded to via e-mail. WilliamH (talk) 11:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WilliamH/Archive_9&oldid=1138300483"