User talk:Wilfred Day

Welcome!

Hello, Wilfred Day, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Exteray ^T ^.C 02:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of deletion debate for Instant-runoff voting controversies

You have either participated in a previous deletion debate over this article, or edited the article or its Talk page. If you are interested in contributing to the current debate, please visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instant-runoff voting controversies (2nd nomination). Thanks. --Abd (talk) 22:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Nycole Turmel, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 22:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wilfred Day. You have new messages at Talk:Nycole Turmel.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nycole Turmel

Good job with finding the Our Times article on Nycole Turmel. It's a gold mine that really adds to the article. Prowsej (talk) 22:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC) - Joshua, articling student, Vancouver[reply]

John Vanthof

Greetings, fellow rabblerouser! (asterix here). Just wanted to call your attention to a recent edit you made to John Vanthof, adding a reference to The Temiskaming Speaker to support his age: the problem with the Speaker is that their URLs don't remain in place as permanent links to articles, but instead, each week the old article disappears and the URL becomes a link to an article in the new issue — so when I clicked on that link today, instead of an article about John Vanthof I was taken to one about a guy named Des Hemingway who's a community volunteer in Haileybury.

Generally speaking, it's actually far more important to provide the title, publication and date of a reference article than it is the web URL. A plain URL that gets taken down or changed becomes a lost reference that we have to remove from the article again, whereas if we'd had the full data (i.e. "Article about John Vanthof". Temiskaming Speaker, October 12, 2011.) then we'd still have a valid and functioning reference even after stripping the URL. So we should always provide all the available citation data instead of just the web URL alone. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 17:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Counties of Northumberland and Durham, Ontario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fixed. Wilfred Day (talk) 14:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medicine Hat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redcliff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fixed. Wilfred Day (talk) 14:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarians? - Ontario election

I have started a discussion about the Libertarians in the candidate section of the Ontario election article, I thought you might want to join in. Me-123567-Me (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Salma Ataullahjan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

were [[Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan]], [[Emily Stowe]] and [[Terry Fox]]. <ref name=south asia mail> [http://www.southasiamail.com/news.php?id=73718 "Profile of the new senator, Salma Ataullahjan" </

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:45, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, I hope.Wilfred Day (talk) 03:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Wilfred Day, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Cathy Sproule has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wilfred Day. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wilfred Day. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

Hello, Wilfred Day. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright (again)

Hello Wilfred. Thanks for your recent additions to Danish election articles, but you appear to have copied and pasted the text directly from the source. This is a clear copyright violation and not allowed on Wikipedia. This has already been pointed out to you previously, so it is concerning that you are still doing this.

Also, when adding references, the reference tag should go after the punctuation (full stops or commas), and it's not considered good practice to leave a bare url. Number 5 7 22:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I understand the copyright issue but I had forgotten the previous warning. Thank you for fixing my edits. Yes, I do know it's not considered good practice to leave a bare url, but I didn't take the time to do it neatly. (By the way, I finished fixing the edit to the April 1920 election to correct this point.) Wilfred Day (talk) 04:09, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kamala Harris

I reverted your edit. Don't forget that in Quebec, high school only goes to Grade 11. And then you do two years of college (CEGEP) before entering a Quebec university - or one year (if you choose the right courses) if you go to an Ontario or US university. What I've scratched my head about for a long time though - is did she go to CEGEP - and if so, which one? Nfitz (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a mystery. I know Quebec has 2 years of CEGEP, but I find no hint she ever went to one. She could have taken a gap year and edited it out of her book, but no one has unmasked it yet. Google "Kamala Harris" + 1981, and again with 1982. Zilch. Except everyone says she started Howard in 1982, why did you delete that??? Wilfred Day (talk) 05:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nor can I. If she remained in Montreal, she'd have been at one of a handful of colleges ... or possibly another year at Westmount (unusual ... but I knew a couple in my class who did that after graduating, to get the right credits). It is a mystery. It's very typical for those in Quebec, at that time, who were planning to go to University in Ontario or the USA, to only do one year of Cegep. I hadn't meant to delete anything else - I'll check the edit. Gosh, if I can find it ... lots of activity. Nfitz (talk) 21:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The 1982 date for Howard is back in. As for where she went after 1981, my guess would be Dawson College, that was where most anglophones went at that time. But google finds nothing. Wilfred Day (talk) 02:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dawson is one candidate, and the old Selby campus would have been not too far away. But (at the time at least), Dawson was the college of last choice - you ended up there because you couldn't get in anywhere else. (which is indeed a possibility if her French was weak). The brighter kids tended to end up at Vanier - most likely the old Snowdon campus - which was walking distance from her elementary school. But also nearby is Marianopolis College, which was by far the best one around, but tough to get into. Others meanwhile ended up further afield. I am mystified! Nfitz (talk) 17:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, she went to Vanier. I have added this. Wilfred Day (talk) 20:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stanley Knowles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. Wilfred Day (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]