User talk:Wikieditorjpa

Welcome!

Hello, Wikieditorjpa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 00:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kennedy Classics (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add references that show that the subject has been written about in depth by multiple reliable, independent publications.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kennedy Classics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kennedy Classics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikieditorjpa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--i'll review as to whether it can be remedied. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 01:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Truths That Transform (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add references that show that the subject has been written about in depth by multiple reliable, independent publications.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Truths That Transform and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Truths That Transform, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll take a look and see if it can be brought up to standards or not. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello and thank you for disclosing on your user page that you are being paid by D. James Kennedy Ministries to edit Wikipedia on their behalf. Please now familiarise yourself with the rules on paid editing. You can make very limited edits on the article relating to the Ministeries yourself but for all other changes you must make edit requests instead. Please reply to me here to confirm that you've read and understood these policies. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:25, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have read the policy and understand the limitation to minor edits. I did add a list of Kennedy books, which was an item missing from his entry. Hopefully, that is a more scribal and not editorial contribution, per se. You can review and judge for yourself. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 01:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article submissions declined

Hi, I noticed your article submissions are getting declined. The reason is that you have too many cites to Kennedy-affiliated sources, which are primary sources. In order for an article to to be approved you need in depth coverage in multiple secondary sources. They are very strict about that around here. That could be the New York Times, Washington Times, Fox News or even Christianity Today. Incidentally I read Draft:D. James Kennedy Ministries. While it's well written, I predict it will also be declined due insufficient secondary sources. If you have questions feel free to ask here WT:WikiProject Conservatism. – Lionel^(talk) 10:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D. James Kennedy Ministries has been accepted

D. James Kennedy Ministries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much--I'm encouraged by your response. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Hi Wikieditorjpa! Congratulations on the acceptance of D. James Kennedy Ministries. Would you like to maximize pageviews and get your article exposure on Wikipedia's Main page? Here's how "DYK For Newbies." I’m inviting you to join other people who edit conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can ask questions and meet new colleagues. I hope to see you there! – Lionel^(talk) 08:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll stop by at some point. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D. James Kennedy Center for Christian Statesmanship has been accepted

D. James Kennedy Center for Christian Statesmanship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

D. James Kennedy Ministries

Hi, the article needs a reference for each paragraph. Also, and this is optional, this article could use an infobox i.e. template:Infobox organization and a footer for all related articles would also be good e.g. Template:Focus_on_the_Family. – Lionel^(talk) 07:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll work on the references. I see a few paragraphs lack them. Not sure about the infobox but will take a look at the example. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You know you should not be making major edits at D. James Kennedy Ministries

Please don’t do that again. Minor formal updates of positions, etc only. Doug Weller talk 20:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The last edit prior to today was 2018. Changes are needed. Please take a look and let me know.

Thank you. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 20:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, update the name of someone holding a position, fine. Add unsourced material about people, a policy violation, see WP:V. The SPLC stuff, absolutely not and the next time you do that I will block you from editing the article, leaving you free to edit the talk page. Doug Weller talk 10:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the leadership information and provided source information.

This article is outdated and needs multiple edits to be current--including its references to SPLC leadership.

I'm particularly concerned about the first paragraph of the entry which cites the SPLC "hate group" designation WITHOUT any indication of DJKM's vigorous rejection of the hate label. It's unclear why that explosive charge is allowed to stand alone without a DJKM denial. Is doing so consistent with Wikipedia standards? Please reply.

Standing as it now does, it's pejorative and demonstrates bias to simply list SPLC's judgment and to do so without providing DJKM's response. I strongly recommend moving the SPLC charge into the defamation lawsuit dismissed" section below where it can be addressed with a more even-handed elaboration. And that section also needs to be updated to include last week's U.S. Supreme Court action on the lawsuit.

As time permits, I'll present copy for possible insertion here for your consideration or that of other editors. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 15:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikieditorjpa this needs to take place at the article talk page. NOT here. It needs to be more public. Doug Weller talk 17:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okay, thanks, I'll post there. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 20:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please see section in talk page at D. James Kennedy Ministries proposing a section to balance the SPLC allegation about DJKM inserted at top of entry. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 21:12, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Section at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/D._James_Kennedy_Ministries

Please see section in talk page at D. James Kennedy Ministries proposing copy to balance the SPLC allegation about DJKM inserted at top of entry. Wikieditorjpa (talk) 21:12 Wikieditorjpa (talk) 21:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]